Suppr超能文献

主要癌症手术后,从索引医院与非索引医院再次入院的比率和结果比较。

Comparison of Rates and Outcomes of Readmission to Index vs Nonindex Hospitals After Major Cancer Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC.

Department of Applied Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):719-727. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0380.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. The magnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013.

EXPOSURES

Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1% were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2% higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3% higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.

摘要

重要性

癌症手术的区域化程度不断提高,如果在索引医院以外的医院再次入院,可能会导致护理的碎片化。在索引医院以外的医院再次入院的程度和不良影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估主要癌症手术后到非索引医院的再入院率,并比较索引和非索引医院再入院的结果。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项多中心、基于人群的、全国代表性的成年患者主要癌症手术(定义为食管切除术或胃切除术、肝胆切除术、胰切除术、结直肠切除术或膀胱切除术)的研究中,使用全国再入院数据库(2013 年 1 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日的入院数据)进行回顾性分析。描述性分析用于确定 90 天再入院的特征,包括时间、成本和结果。通过设施聚类调整,研究使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与非索引与索引再入院相关的因素。该研究还使用回归模型来确定两组之间死亡率、主要并发症和随后再入院的差异。数据分析于 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日进行。

暴露

索引与非索引医院的再入院(定义为索引医院以外的任何医院)。

主要结果和测量

主要癌症手术后 90 天再入院率和非索引再入院率,与非索引再入院相关的因素,以及索引与非索引医院患者的住院死亡率、医院费用和随后再入院率的差异。

结果

共有 60970 名患者纳入研究(平均[标准差]年龄为 67[13]岁;7619[55.6%]为男性,6075[44.4%]为女性)。90 天再入院率为 23.0%。在 13695 例首次再入院中,20.1%是到非索引医院。与非索引医院再入院相关的独立因素包括手术类型、合并症(OR,1.40;95%CI,1.15-1.70)、择期入院(OR,1.21;95%CI,1.06-1.37)、出院至护理机构(OR,1.20;95%CI,1.07-1.36)和教学医院手术(OR,1.16;95%CI,1.00-1.34)(均 P<0.05)。在风险调整后,非索引医院再入院的患者死亡率高出 31.2%(比值比,1.31;95%CI,1.05-1.64),主要并发症发生率高出 27.3%(比值比,1.27;95%CI,1.14-1.42)。两组间的后续再入院率和医院费用无差异。

结论和相关性

大约五分之一的再入院是到非索引医院,与索引医院再入院相比,死亡率和发病率更高。已经确定了影响非索引再入院的因素,以便进行干预。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Readmission to a non-index hospital following total joint replacement.全关节置换术后再次入住非索引医院。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Jan 24;5(1):60-68. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.51.BJO-2023-0118.R1.

本文引用的文献

6
Exploring the burden of inpatient readmissions after major cancer surgery.探索重大癌症手术后住院再入院的负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):455-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5938. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验