• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血的危险因素。

Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean myomectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;60(1):41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.007
PMID:33495006
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We intended to identify the risk factors of intraoperative hemorrhage on occasions of a combined operation of myomectomy with cesarean section for patients with uterine leiomyoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was done of all patients who underwent cesarean myomectomy for intramural leiomyoma at a single university hospital. Cases identified with subserosal leiomyoma, placental disorder, and comorbid conditions related to coagulopathy were excluded. All the included cases were classified into intraoperative hemorrhage and non-hemorrhage group. Obstetric and demographic factors and parameters of leiomyoma were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 302 women underwent cesarean myomectomy during the study period. Among these women, 212 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 43 women (20.3%). There was no significant intergroup difference in the number of removed leiomyomas. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lower segmental location (odds ratio [OR], 2.827; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.033-7.734, P = 0.043) and the diameter (OR, 1.167; 95% CI, 1.044-1.305, P = 0.006) were significant independent risk factors for hemorrhage during cesarean myomectomy. The combination of ≥ 8 cm diameter or lower segmental position of the leiomyoma yielded a specificity of 79.3% for operative hemorrhage during cesarean myomectomy. The negative predictive value of this combination was 88.7% for operative hemorrhage with a prevalence of 20%.

CONCLUSION

The large size and lower segmental position of the leiomyoma are significantly risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean myomectomy. If the leiomyoma is located in the uterine fundus or body and its diameter is less than 8 cm, the removal of leiomyoma may be considered at the time of cesarean section.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定在子宫肌瘤患者剖宫产联合子宫肌瘤剔除术中发生术中出血的危险因素。

材料和方法

对单所大学医院行剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。排除阔韧带、胎盘异常及与凝血障碍相关的合并症患者。将所有纳入的病例分为术中出血组和非出血组。比较两组的产科和人口统计学因素及子宫肌瘤参数。

结果

在研究期间,共有 302 名女性接受了剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术。其中 212 名孕妇符合纳入标准。术中出血发生于 43 名女性(20.3%)。两组间剔除的子宫肌瘤数量无显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示下段位置(比值比[OR],2.827;95%置信区间[CI],1.033-7.734,P=0.043)和肌瘤直径(OR,1.167;95%CI,1.044-1.305,P=0.006)是剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血的显著独立危险因素。当肌瘤直径≥8cm或下段位置时,剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术术中出血的特异性为 79.3%。在 20%的发生率下,该组合对术中出血的阴性预测值为 88.7%。

结论

肌瘤较大且下段位置是剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血的显著危险因素。如果肌瘤位于子宫底或体部且直径小于 8cm,则可考虑在剖宫产时剔除肌瘤。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean myomectomy.剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血的危险因素。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;60(1):41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.007.
2
Intraoperative hemorrhage as a complication of cesarean myomectomy: analysis of risk factors.剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血作为一种并发症:危险因素分析
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 May;73(5):415-21. doi: 10.2298/vsp141105029s.
3
Outcome and risk factors of cesarean delivery with and without cesarean myomectomy in women with uterine myomatas.患有子宫肌瘤的女性行剖宫产同时或不同时行剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术的结局及危险因素
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;295(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4177-8. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Endometrial myomectomy: a novel surgical method during cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫内膜肌瘤切除术:一种新型手术方法
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;31(4):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1286320. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Outcomes after cesarean myomectomy versus cesarean alone among pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas.子宫肌瘤孕妇剖宫产同时行肌瘤切除术与单纯剖宫产的术后结局比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;130(3):244-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 May 17.
6
The trend in cesarean myomectomies and the risk of obstetrical complications in Korea.韩国剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术的趋势与产科并发症风险。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 3;22(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04674-3.
7
Perioperative Complications of Cesarean Delivery Myomectomy: A Meta-analysis.剖宫产术中子宫肌瘤切除术的围手术期并发症:Meta 分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1295-1303. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002342.
8
Uterine artery ligation for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫动脉结扎术治疗合并子宫平滑肌瘤的孕妇。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.027. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
9
Bilateral ascending uterine artery ligation vs. tourniquet use for hemostasis in cesarean myomectomy. A comparison.剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎与使用止血带止血的比较
J Reprod Med. 2003 Dec;48(12):950-4.
10
Cesarean myomectomy for solitary uterine fibroids: Is it a safe procedure?剖宫产时行单发子宫肌瘤切除术:这是一种安全的手术吗?
Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(1):54-8. doi: 10.17772/gp/57833.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of cesarean myomectomy in Singleton compared with twin pregnancies: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.单胎妊娠与双胎妊娠剖宫产肌瘤切除术的结局:一项10年回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02924-7.
2
Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of Type I neurofibromatosis.I 型神经纤维瘤病术中出血的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02067-7.
3
Clinical outcome analysis of intramural myoma greater than 8 cm in diameter removed during caesarean section: a retrospective study.
剖宫产术中切除直径大于 8cm 壁间肌瘤的临床结局分析:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02210-9.
4
The trend in cesarean myomectomies and the risk of obstetrical complications in Korea.韩国剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术的趋势与产科并发症风险。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 3;22(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04674-3.