Rasch D K, Bunegin L, Ledbetter J, Kaminskas D
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7838.
Can J Anaesth. 1988 Jan;35(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03010540.
To evaluate effects of anaesthesia delivery systems on respiratory work in infants, we measured end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), transcutaneous PCO2 (PTcCO2) respiratory rate and arterial blood gases in infants (ages 0.2 to 23.8 months) anaesthetised with either a Jackson-Rees (n = 11) or paediatric circle absorber system (n = 15). Two hours after induction, with assisted ventilation there was no difference in PETCO2, PTcCO2, respiratory rate, pH or PaCO2 in infants anaesthetised with either system. In the laboratory, we measured inspiratory and expiratory resistances to breathing through each system at various tidal volumes and total gas flows into the circuit. These values were compared to resistances created by breathing through an appropriately sized endotracheal tube. Although there was lower resistance to ventilation through Jackson-Rees system, both systems had lower resistances for almost all flows tested than breathing through an endotracheal tube alone (p less than 0.05). The paediatric circle absorber system is an efficient apparatus for anaesthetising spontaneously breathing infants.
为评估麻醉输送系统对婴儿呼吸功的影响,我们测量了使用杰克逊 - 里斯系统(n = 11)或小儿循环吸收器系统(n = 15)麻醉的0.2至23.8个月婴儿的呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)、经皮二氧化碳分压(PTcCO2)、呼吸频率和动脉血气。诱导两小时后,在辅助通气情况下,使用任一系统麻醉的婴儿在PETCO2、PTcCO2、呼吸频率、pH值或动脉血二氧化碳分压方面均无差异。在实验室中,我们在不同潮气量和进入回路的总气体流量下测量了通过每个系统的吸气和呼气呼吸阻力。将这些值与通过适当尺寸气管导管呼吸产生的阻力进行比较。尽管通过杰克逊 - 里斯系统通气的阻力较低,但与仅通过气管导管呼吸相比,两个系统在几乎所有测试流量下的阻力都更低(p小于0.05)。小儿循环吸收器系统是用于麻醉自主呼吸婴儿的有效设备。