Suppr超能文献

[不同类型麻醉呼吸机对婴儿短期麻醉期间氧合及通气的影响。一项采用经皮氧分压和二氧化碳分压监测的研究]

[The effect of different types of anesthetic respirators on oxygenation and ventilation in infants during short-term anesthesia. A study using transcutaneous PO2 and PCO2 monitoring].

作者信息

Scheiber G, Hess W, Marichal A

机构信息

Institut für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1994 Aug;43(8):510-20. doi: 10.1007/s001010050086.

Abstract

Monitoring of ventilation in infants is difficult and often not very reliable. In this study, transcutaneous measurement of blood gas tensions was used to investigate the influence of four different modes of ventilation on oxygenation and ventilation in anaesthetized infants. METHODS. In a randomised study, transcutaneously measured PO2 (tc-PO2) and PCO2 (tcPCO2) tensions were continuously registered in 42 ASA class I and II infants between 3 and 24 weeks of age undergoing minor surgical procedures (inguinal hernia repair). Two breathing systems combined with different modes of ventilation were evaluated: manual ventilation with Kuhn's T-piece system and face mask (group A; n = 11) or endotracheal tube (group B; n = 10); manual ventilation with paediatric circuit system and face mask (group C; n = 11); and mechanical ventilation with paediatric circle system, endotracheal tube, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 3 cm H2O (group D; n = 10). Transcutaneous values were measured by a combined tcPO2/PCO2 electrode (E 5277, Radiometer). Anaesthesia was maintained by controlled ventilation with N2O/O2 (67%/33%) and halothane 0.5-1.5 vol.%. Surgical and anaesthetic techniques were standardized and the anaesthetist was blinded to the measured values. RESULTS. Preoperative mean tcPO2 values while spontaneously breathing air ranged between 69 and 75 mmHg in all patients. During anaesthesia and controlled ventilation (FiO2 = 0.33), there was a significant increase in tcPO2 (P < 0.01) in 3 groups: in groups A and D mean tcPO2 increased to 90-100 mmHg and in group C to 110-120 mmHg. In contrast, tcPO2 in group B reached only 75-80 mmHg, which was not considered significant. Postoperatively, tcPO2 immediately reached baseline values in all patients (Fig. 2). Compared to preoperative values, the alveolar-tcPO2 difference (AtcDO2) significantly increased during anaesthesia in all groups (Fig. 3). The tcPCO2 measurements revealed marked alveolar dysventilation, with hyperventilation supervening in groups A, B, and D; in group C, however, most (7 of 11) infants were normoventilated (Fig. 4). CONCLUSIONS. Adverse effects of anaesthesia on pulmonary function in infants are caused by loss of the PEEP effect induced by the physiological subglottic stenosis. Endotracheal intubation and the increase in chest wall compliance during anaesthesia lead to a decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) associated with premature airway closure and ventilation/perfusion mismatch. These pathophysiological disturbances result in a marked increase in AaDO2 and low arterial PO2 values despite high FiO2, as could be observed when intubated infants had been ventilated with a high-flow T-piece system (group B). Mechanical ventilation with a paediatric circuit system and endotracheal tube allows the use of low PEEP levels (group D), which may replace the lost subglottic function and partially restore the FRC. Ventilation by mask does not disturb the functional subglottic stenosis, and the impairment of pulmonary function will depend solely on the decrease in FRC caused by increased chest wall compliance (group A). If mask ventilation is combined with a paediatric circuit system (group C), the pressure relief valve produces a low PEEP of 2 to 3 cm H2O, which may partially counteract the decrease in FRC. With regard to oxygenation, the paediatric circle system proved to be superior to the high-flow T-piece system independent of whether children were ventilated via a face mask or an endotracheal tube. The group-specific differences in degree of dysventilation with manual ventilation show that the type of breathing system is important with regard to the size of the tidal volume delivered. Thus, tidal volumes will be unintentionally increased by the high fresh gas flow needed when a T-piece system is used. The lower flow and preadjusted pressure limit may prevent the delivery of excessive tidal volumes with the paediatric circuit system...

摘要

监测婴儿的通气情况很困难,而且往往不太可靠。在本研究中,采用经皮血气张力测量法来研究四种不同通气模式对麻醉婴儿氧合及通气的影响。方法:在一项随机研究中,对42例年龄在3至24周、接受小型外科手术(腹股沟疝修补术)的ASA I级和II级婴儿,连续记录经皮测量的PO2(tc-PO2)和PCO2(tcPCO2)张力。评估了两种与不同通气模式相结合的呼吸装置:使用库恩T形管系统和面罩的手动通气(A组;n = 11)或气管内插管(B组;n = 10);使用小儿回路系统和面罩的手动通气(C组;n = 11);以及使用小儿循环系统、气管内插管和3 cm H2O呼气末正压(PEEP)的机械通气(D组;n = 10)。经皮值通过组合式tcPO2/PCO2电极(E 5277,雷度米特公司)测量。通过N2O/O2(67%/33%)和0.5 - 1.5 vol.%的氟烷进行控制通气维持麻醉。手术和麻醉技术标准化,麻醉医生对测量值不知情。结果:所有患者在自主呼吸空气时术前平均tcPO2值在69至75 mmHg之间。在麻醉和控制通气期间(FiO2 = 0.33),3组tcPO2显著升高(P < 0.01):A组和D组平均tcPO2升至90 - 100 mmHg,C组升至110 - 120 mmHg。相比之下,B组tcPO2仅达到75 - 80 mmHg,未被视为有显著差异。术后,所有患者tcPO2立即恢复至基线值(图2)。与术前值相比,所有组在麻醉期间肺泡 - tcPO2差值(AtcDO2)显著增加(图3)。tcPCO2测量显示明显的肺泡通气不足,A组、B组和D组出现过度通气;然而,C组中大多数(11例中的7例)婴儿通气正常(图4)。结论:麻醉对婴儿肺功能的不良影响是由生理性声门下狭窄诱导的PEEP效应丧失所致。气管内插管以及麻醉期间胸壁顺应性增加导致功能残气量(FRC)减少,伴有气道过早关闭和通气/灌注不匹配。这些病理生理紊乱导致AaDO2显著增加以及尽管FiO2高但动脉PO2值低,如在使用高流量T形管系统对插管婴儿进行通气时(B组)所观察到的数据。使用小儿回路系统和气管内插管进行机械通气允许使用低水平PEEP(D组),这可能替代丧失的声门下功能并部分恢复FRC。面罩通气不会干扰功能性声门下狭窄,肺功能损害将仅取决于胸壁顺应性增加导致的FRC降低(A组)。如果面罩通气与小儿回路系统相结合(C组),减压阀产生2至3 cm H2O的低PEEP,这可能部分抵消FRC的降低。关于氧合,小儿循环系统被证明优于高流量T形管系统,无论患儿是通过面罩还是气管内插管进行通气。手动通气时不同组通气不足程度的差异表明,就输送的潮气量大小而言,呼吸装置的类型很重要。因此,使用T形管系统时所需的高新鲜气体流量会无意中增加潮气量。较低的流量和预先设定的压力限制可能防止使用小儿回路系统时输送过大的潮气量……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验