Suppr超能文献

在一家三级中心,教学内科、受雇医院医生和临时工医院医生服务的住院和出院后结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Hospitalization and Post-hospitalization Outcomes Among Teaching Internal Medicine, Employed Hospitalist, and Locum Tenens Hospitalist Services in a Tertiary Center: a Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toledo/Promedica Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA.

Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3040-3051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06578-4. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no prospective studies comparing hospitalization and post-hospitalization outcomes between teaching internal medicine services and non-teaching hospitalists, and no prospective studies comparing these outcomes between locum and employed hospitalists.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the length of stay, hospital costs readmission rate, and mortality rate in patients treated by teaching internal medicine services vs. hospitalists and among patients treated by locum vs. employed hospitalists.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study. Propensity score was used to obtain weighted estimates.

SETTING

Referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients 18 years and older admitted to internal medicine services.

INTERVENTION

Treatment by teaching internal medicine services vs. hospitalists. Treatment by locum hospitalists vs. employed hospitalists.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcome was adjusted length of stay and secondary outcomes included hospital cost, inpatient mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission, and 30-day mortality.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 1273 patients were admitted in the study period. The mean patient age was 61 ± 19 years, and the sample was 52% females. Teaching internal medicine physicians admitted 526 patients and non-teaching hospitalists admitted 747 patients. Being seen exclusively by teaching internal medicine physicians comports with a shorter adjusted hospital stay by 0.6 days (95% CI - 1.07 to - 0.22, P = .003) compared to non-teaching hospitalists. Adjusted length of stay was 1 day shorter in patients seen exclusively by locums compared to patients seen exclusively by employed services (95% CI - 1.6 to - 0.43, P < .001) with an adjusted average hospital cost saving of 1339 dollars (95% CI - 2037 to - 642, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching internal medicine services care was associated with a shorter stay but not with increased costs, readmission, or mortality compared to non-teaching services. In contrary to the "expected," patients treated by locums had shorter stays and decreased hospital costs but no increase in readmissions or mortality.

摘要

背景

目前尚无前瞻性研究比较教学内科服务和非教学医院医生之间的住院和住院后结局,也没有前瞻性研究比较轮班制和受雇医院医生之间的这些结局。

目的

比较接受教学内科服务治疗与医院医生治疗、接受轮班制医院医生治疗与受雇医院医生治疗的患者的住院时间、住院费用、再入院率和死亡率。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。采用倾向评分获得加权估计。

设置

转诊中心。

患者

18 岁及以上入住内科服务的所有患者。

干预措施

接受教学内科服务与医院医生治疗。接受轮班制医院医生与受雇医院医生治疗。

主要观察指标

主要结局为调整后的住院时间,次要结局包括住院费用、住院死亡率、30 天全因再入院率和 30 天死亡率。

结果

研究期间共收治 1273 例患者。患者平均年龄为 61±19 岁,样本中女性占 52%。教学内科医生收治 526 例患者,非教学医院医生收治 747 例患者。与非教学医院医生相比,仅由教学内科医生接诊的患者调整后的住院时间缩短了 0.6 天(95%CI-1.07 至-0.22,P=0.003)。与仅由受雇服务接诊的患者相比,仅由轮班医生接诊的患者调整后的住院时间缩短了 1 天(95%CI-1.6 至-0.43,P<0.001),平均节省住院费用 1339 美元(95%CI-2037 至-642,P<0.001)。其他结局无统计学差异。

结论

与非教学服务相比,教学内科服务的治疗与较短的住院时间相关,但与增加的费用、再入院率或死亡率无关。与“预期”相反,接受轮班制治疗的患者住院时间更短,住院费用更低,但再入院率或死亡率没有增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ff/8481444/2dc68ab0e87f/11606_2020_6578_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验