Suppr超能文献

“反向七月效应”:入院时间、医疗团队工作量与30天再入院率之间的关联。

A "reverse july effect": association between timing of admission, medical team workload, and 30-day readmission rate.

作者信息

Averbukh Yelena, Southern William

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1):65-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00014.1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High teaching team workload has been associated with poor supervision and worse patient outcomes, yet it is unclear whether this association is more pronounced during the early months of the academic year when the residents are less experienced.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the associations between teaching team workload, timing of admission, and the 30-day readmission rate.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, all admissions to an urban internal medicine teaching service over a 16-month period were divided into 2 groups based on admission date: early in the academic year (July-September) or late (October-June) and further defined as being admitted to "busy" versus "less busy" teams based on number of monthly admissions. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission rate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent association between teaching team workload and readmission rates, stratified by time of year of admission after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 12 118 admissions examined, 2352 (19.4%) were admitted early in the year, and 9766 (80.6%) were admitted later. After multivariate adjustment, we found that patients admitted to busy versus less busy teams in the first quarter had similar 30-day readmission rate (odds ratio [OR]adj  =  1.03 [0.82-1.30]). Later year admission to a busy team was associated with increased risk of readmission after adjustment (ORadj  =  1.16 [1.03-1.30]).

CONCLUSIONS

Admission to busy teams early in the year was not associated with increased odds of 30-day readmission, whereas admission later in the year to busy teams was associated with 16% increased odds of readmission.

摘要

背景

教学团队工作量大与监督不力及患者预后较差有关,但尚不清楚这种关联在学年初期住院医师经验不足时是否更为明显。

目的

我们研究了教学团队工作量、入院时间与30天再入院率之间的关联。

方法

在这项回顾性观察研究中,城市内科教学服务机构16个月期间的所有入院患者根据入院日期分为两组:学年早期(7月至9月)或晚期(10月至次年6月),并根据每月入院人数进一步定义为入住“繁忙”团队与“不太繁忙”团队。主要结局是30天再入院率。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定教学团队工作量与再入院率之间的独立关联,在对人口统计学和临床特征进行调整后,按入院年份分层。

结果

在12118例接受检查的入院患者中,2352例(19.4%)在年初入院,9766例(80.6%)在晚些时候入院。多因素调整后,我们发现第一季度入住繁忙团队与不太繁忙团队的患者30天再入院率相似(调整优势比[OR]adj = 1.03[0.82 - 1.30])。调整后,年末入住繁忙团队与再入院风险增加相关(ORadj = 1.16[1.03 - 1.30])。

结论

年初入住繁忙团队与30天再入院几率增加无关,而年末入住繁忙团队与再入院几率增加16%相关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Risk factors for hospital readmission of elderly patients.老年患者住院再入院的风险因素。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Jan;24(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
The July effect: fertile ground for systems improvement.七月效应:系统改进的沃土。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Sep 6;155(5):331-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00352. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验