• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的生物可吸收支架:直面老问题,带来新希望。

Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Facing Old Problems, Raising New Hopes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Science, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.

Department of cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jan 25;23(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01447-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-021-01447-w
PMID:33495895
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss about the reasons behind the failure of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) device and about the challenges the future holds for the next generation of the bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Absorb BVS was burdened by intrinsic structural limitations which resulted in augmented rates of device thrombosis and clinical adverse events compared to current-generation metallic stent. Nevertheless, new generation devices with novel design and materials are in development. Second generation BRS have enhanced mechanical strength, smaller footprints, less thrombogenicity and modified bioresorption. These features, paired with proper patient and lesion selection and optimal "user-friendly" implant techniques, could possibly overcome the previous BRS generation limitations, rekindling physicians, and industry interest on this promising technology.

摘要

目的综述

在本次综述中,我们讨论了 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)装置失败的原因,以及下一代生物可吸收支架(BRS)技术所面临的挑战。

最近的发现

Absorb BVS 存在固有结构限制,与目前的金属支架相比,导致设备血栓形成和临床不良事件的发生率增加。然而,具有新型设计和材料的新一代设备正在研发中。第二代 BRS 具有增强的机械强度、更小的占位面积、更低的血栓形成率和改良的生物可吸收性。这些特性,再加上适当的患者和病变选择以及最佳的“用户友好”植入技术,可能克服之前 BRS 代的局限性,重新激发医生和行业对这项有前途的技术的兴趣。

相似文献

1
Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Facing Old Problems, Raising New Hopes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的生物可吸收支架:直面老问题,带来新希望。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jan 25;23(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01447-w.
2
The Current Literature on Bioabsorbable Stents: a Review.生物可吸收支架的最新文献综述。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Nov 25;21(12):54. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0816-4.
3
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: Clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials.用于治疗冠状动脉疾病的生物可吸收血管支架:随机对照试验的临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;88(S1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26810.
4
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Challenges of the newer generation of resorbable magnesium scaffolds: Lessons from failure mechanisms of the past generation.新一代可吸收镁支架的挑战:从过去一代的失败机制中吸取的教训。
J Cardiol. 2023 Feb;81(2):179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
6
Three to four years outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second-generation drug-eluting stent: A meta-analysis.吸收性生物可吸收血管支架与第二代药物洗脱支架的三至四年结果:荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95(2):216-223. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28290. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗小血管疾病的比较:COMPARE II、RAI和MAASSTAD-ABSORB研究的倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):E115-E124. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27522. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial.在 ABSORB II 试验中,生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架的术后对称性、扩张和偏心对临床结果的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.027. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial.采用依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解冠状动脉支架的 3 年临床结果:ABSORB III 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Latest generation stents: is it time to revive the bioresorbable scaffold?最新一代支架:生物可吸收支架是否到了复兴的时候?
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2020 Oct;68(5):415-435. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress in research and development of biodegradable metallic vascular stents.可生物降解金属血管支架的研发进展
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Nov 28;49(11):1861-1868. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230514.