• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解冠状动脉支架的 3 年临床结果:ABSORB III 试验。

3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial.

机构信息

The Christ Hospital, Heart and Vascular Center, Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010
PMID:29100702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Absorb everolimus-eluting poly-L-lactic acid-based bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides early drug delivery and mechanical support functions similar to metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), followed by complete bioresorption in approximately 3 years with recovery of vascular structure and function. The ABSORB III trial demonstrated noninferior rates of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year in 2,008 patients with coronary artery disease randomized to BVS versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess clinical outcomes through 3 years following BVS implantation.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes from the ABSORB III trial were analyzed by randomized treatment assignment cumulative through 3 years, and between 1 and 3 years.

RESULTS

The primary composite endpoint of target lesion failure through 3 years occurred in 13.4% of BVS patients and 10.4% of EES patients (p = 0.06), and between 1 and 3 years in 7.0% versus 6.0% of patients, respectively (p = 0.39). TVMI through 3 years was increased with BVS (8.6% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.03), as was device thrombosis (2.3% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01). In BVS-assigned patients, treatment of very small vessels (those with quantitatively determined reference vessel diameter <2.25 mm) was an independent predictor of 3-year TLF and scaffold thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ABSORB III trial, 3-year adverse event rates were higher with BVS than EES, particularly TVMI and device thrombosis. Longer-term clinical follow-up is required to determine whether bioresorption of the polymeric scaffold will influence patient prognosis. (ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906).

摘要

背景

Absorb 依维莫司洗脱聚左旋乳酸基生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)提供了早期药物输送和机械支撑功能,类似于金属药物洗脱支架(DES),随后在大约 3 年内完全生物吸收,恢复血管结构和功能。ABSORB III 试验在 2008 例患有冠状动脉疾病的患者中比较了 BVS 与钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架(EES),结果显示 1 年时靶病变失败(心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死[TVMI]或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建)的非劣效率。

目的

本研究旨在评估 BVS 植入后 3 年的临床结果。

方法

通过 3 年的随机治疗分配累积分析 ABSORB III 试验的临床结果,并在 1 年至 3 年之间进行比较。

结果

BVS 组患者 3 年时的主要复合终点事件发生率为 13.4%,EES 组患者为 10.4%(p=0.06),1 年至 3 年之间分别为 7.0%和 6.0%(p=0.39)。BVS 组 3 年 TVMI 发生率较高(8.6% vs. 5.9%;p=0.03),器械血栓形成(2.3% vs. 0.7%;p=0.01)也较高。在 BVS 组患者中,治疗非常小的血管(定量确定参考血管直径<2.25mm)是 3 年时 TLR 和支架血栓形成的独立预测因素。

结论

在 ABSORB III 试验中,BVS 的 3 年不良事件发生率高于 EES,尤其是 TVMI 和器械血栓形成。需要更长时间的临床随访来确定聚合物支架的生物吸收是否会影响患者的预后。(ABSORB III 随机对照试验[RCT] [ABSORB-III];NCT01751906)。

相似文献

1
3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial.采用依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解冠状动脉支架的 3 年临床结果:ABSORB III 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
2
Clinical Outcomes Before and After Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial.完全降解依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架吸收前后的临床结果:ABSORB III 试验 5 年随访。
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1895-1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042584. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy.2 年随访:Absorb 生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病:7 项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析及一项个体化患者数据分析亚研究。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31470-8. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
4
Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.生物可吸收血管支架置入术后技术对结局的影响:ABSORB 试验分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1106. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架的盲法结局和心绞痛评估:ABSORB IV 随机试验的 30 天和 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1530-1540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32283-9. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
7
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.生物可吸收血管支架与金属支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:ABSORB China 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2298-2309. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
8
A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan.在冠状动脉疾病患者中评估依维莫司洗脱 Absorb 生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的随机试验:ABSORB 日本。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3332-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv435. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial.在 ABSORB II 试验中,生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架的术后对称性、扩张和偏心对临床结果的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.027. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架和生物雷帕霉素洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的比较:EVERBIO II试验的两年临床结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.053. Epub 2017 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds advances, challenges, and future directions.生物可吸收支架的进展、挑战及未来方向。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(7):4173-4183. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003424. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Biodegradable Stents in the Treatment of Arterial Stenosis.可生物降解支架在动脉狭窄治疗中的应用
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 16;14(2):532. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020532.
3
Current situation and overview of resorbable magnesium scaffolds: a perspective for overcoming the remaining issues of polymeric bioresorbable scaffold.
可吸收镁支架的现状与概述:克服聚合物生物可吸收支架遗留问题的展望
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Apr;40(2):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01070-w. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
Ten-year clinical outcomes of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents vs. everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-insights from the EVERBIO-2 trial.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架和生物雷帕霉素洗脱冠状动脉支架对比依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的十年临床结果——来自EVERBIO-2试验的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 10;11:1426348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426348. eCollection 2024.
5
Challenges and Advances in Interventional Cardiology for Coronary Artery Disease Management.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病管理的挑战与进展。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 15;60(8):1323. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081323.
6
Bioresorbable Scaffold Use in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: A Long-Term, Single-Center Follow-Up Study.生物可吸收支架在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变中的应用:一项长期、单中心随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 30;60(8):1233. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081233.
7
Five-Year Outcomes of Bioresorbable Stent Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.生物可吸收支架治疗冠心病的五年结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 28;25(7):238. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507238. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Below-the-Knee Arterial Disease: A Literature Review of New Developments.用于膝下动脉疾病的生物可吸收支架:新进展的文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Very late Magmaris scaffold restenosis: a 6-year serial optical coherence tomography case report.极晚期玛格玛瑞斯支架再狭窄:一例6年的光学相干断层扫描系列病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jul 17;8(7):ytae344. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae344. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Two-Year Outcomes for Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Magmaris and Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Large-Vessel Lesions.使用Magmaris和Absorb生物可吸收支架治疗大血管病变的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的两年结局
J Pers Med. 2024 May 17;14(5):540. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050540.