• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在主动脉瓣置换手术中,二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣的基线特征和结果存在差异。

Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in surgical aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 14;59(6):1191-1199. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa474.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezaa474
PMID:33496318
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) comprise a substantial portion of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Our goal was to quantify the prevalence of BAV in the current SAVR ± coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) population, assess differences in cardiovascular risk profiles and assess differences in long-term survival in patients with BAV compared to patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SAVR with or without concomitant CABG and who had a surgical report denoting the relevant valvular anatomy were eligible and included. Prevalence, predictors and outcomes for patients with BAV were analysed and compared to those patients with TAV. Matched patients with BAV and TAV were compared using a propensity score matching strategy and an age matching strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 3723 patients, 3145 of whom (mean age 66.6 ± 11.4 years; 37.4% women) had an operative report describing their aortic valvular morphology, underwent SAVR ± CABG between 1987 and 2016. The overall prevalence of patients with BAV was 19.3% (607). Patients with BAV were younger than patients with TAV (60.6 ± 12.1 vs 68.0 ± 10.7, respectively). In the age-matched cohort, patients with BAV were less likely to have comorbidities, among others diabetes (P = 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001) and hypercholesterolaemia (P = 0.003), compared to patients with TAV. Twenty-year survival following the index procedure was higher in patients with BAV (14.8%) compared to those with TAV (12.9%) in the age-matched cohort (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences in the cardiovascular risk profile exist in patients with BAV and TAV. Long-term survival after SAVR in patients with BAV is satisfactory.

摘要

目的

二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)患者在接受主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者中占很大比例。我们的目标是量化当前 SAVR ± 冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)人群中 BAV 的患病率,评估心血管风险特征的差异,并评估与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)患者相比,BAV 患者的长期生存率差异。

方法

符合条件的患者为接受 SAVR ± CABG 手术且手术报告中注明相关瓣膜解剖结构的患者。分析 BAV 患者的患病率、预测因素和结局,并与 TAV 患者进行比较。使用倾向评分匹配策略和年龄匹配策略比较 BAV 和 TAV 匹配患者。

结果

共纳入 3723 例患者,其中 3145 例(平均年龄 66.6 ± 11.4 岁,37.4%为女性)的手术报告描述了其主动脉瓣形态学,于 1987 年至 2016 年间接受 SAVR ± CABG 手术。BAV 患者的总体患病率为 19.3%(607 例)。BAV 患者比 TAV 患者年轻(分别为 60.6 ± 12.1 岁和 68.0 ± 10.7 岁)。在年龄匹配队列中,与 TAV 患者相比,BAV 患者更不可能患有合并症,例如糖尿病(P = 0.001)、高血压(P < 0.001)和高胆固醇血症(P = 0.003)。在年龄匹配队列中,与 TAV 患者相比,索引手术后 20 年生存率在 BAV 患者中更高(14.8%比 12.9%,P = 0.015)。

结论

BAV 和 TAV 患者的心血管风险特征存在显著差异。BAV 患者接受 SAVR 后的长期生存率令人满意。

相似文献

1
Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in surgical aortic valve replacement.在主动脉瓣置换手术中,二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣的基线特征和结果存在差异。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 14;59(6):1191-1199. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa474.
2
Prevalence of permanent pacemaker implantation after conventional aortic valve replacement-a propensity-matched analysis in patients with a bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve: a benchmark for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.传统主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的发生率——双叶或三叶主动脉瓣患者的倾向匹配分析:经导管主动脉瓣置换的一个基准
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 1;58(1):130-137. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa053.
3
Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.使用新一代球囊扩张式经导管心脏瓣膜在二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣中进行微创经导管主动脉瓣植入的安全性和有效性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Dec;110(12):1993-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01935-7. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.039. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的对比研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):3-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex211.
6
Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣所致重度主动脉瓣狭窄的主动脉瓣环及根部特征:对经导管主动脉瓣治疗的意义
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):E88-98. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25948. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Predictors of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable valve for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄后传导障碍的预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1576-1586. doi: 10.1111/jce.15525. Epub 2022 May 22.
8
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.二叶式主动脉瓣解剖结构与器械的关系:BAVARD 多中心注册研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007107.
9
Outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣患者行保留瓣膜主动脉根部替换术的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jul 3;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02329-8.
10
Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的年龄差异
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 17;26(4):28185. doi: 10.31083/RCM28185. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Propensity-Matched Outcomes Comparing TAVR in Bicuspid vs Surgery in Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.倾向匹配结果:比较二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术与三尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄手术治疗的效果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Nov 26;2(1):100525. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100525. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
3
The Role of NOTCH Pathway Genes in the Inherited Susceptibility to Aortic Stenosis.
NOTCH信号通路基因在主动脉瓣狭窄遗传易感性中的作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):226. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070226.
4
The Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: An Overview of the Literature.二叶式主动脉瓣患者冠状动脉疾病的患病率:文献综述
Aorta (Stamford). 2023 Dec;11(6):191-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785190. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
TAVI in younger patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis: pros and cons.年轻二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:利弊
EuroIntervention. 2022 Nov 18;18(10):790-792. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00042.