二叶式主动脉瓣患者冠状动脉疾病的患病率:文献综述

The Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: An Overview of the Literature.

作者信息

Dolmaci Onur B, Hilhorst Tijmen L, Malekzadeh Arjan, Mertens Bart J A, Klautz Robert J M, Poelmann Robert E, Grewal Nimrat

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Aorta (Stamford). 2023 Dec;11(6):191-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785190. Epub 2024 May 2.

Abstract

The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients is a debatable topic. Several studies have indicated that BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD compared with patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), but the effects of age and gender have not always been considered. This systematic review provides an overview of articles which report on CAD in BAV and TAV patients. Searches were executed in April 2021 and January 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines in three online databases: Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction was done by two investigators separately. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between BAV and TAV patients; a fixed effects model was used for correcting on confounders. Literature search yielded 1,529 articles with 44 being eligible for inclusion. BAV patients were younger (56.4 ± 8.3 years) than TAV patients (64 ± 10.3 years,  < 0.001). All CAD risk factors and CAD were more prevalent in TAV patients. No significant difference remained after correcting for age and gender as confounders. BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD and CAD risk factors compared with TAV patients. However, when the age differences between both groups are considered in the analyses, a similar prevalence of both CAD and CAD risk factors is found.

摘要

二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)患者中冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患病率是一个有争议的话题。几项研究表明,与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)患者相比,BAV患者CAD的患病率较低,但年龄和性别的影响并非总是被考虑在内。本系统评价概述了关于BAV和TAV患者CAD的报道文章。根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,于2021年4月和2022年1月在三个在线数据库(Medline、Embase和Scopus)中进行检索。由两名研究人员分别进行筛选和数据提取。比较BAV和TAV患者的主要和次要结局;使用固定效应模型校正混杂因素。文献检索得到1529篇文章,其中44篇符合纳入标准。BAV患者(56.4±8.3岁)比TAV患者(64±10.3岁,P<0.001)年轻。所有CAD危险因素和CAD在TAV患者中更为普遍。校正年龄和性别作为混杂因素后,无显著差异。与TAV患者相比,BAV患者CAD及CAD危险因素的患病率较低。然而,在分析中考虑两组之间的年龄差异时,发现CAD和CAD危险因素的患病率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497a/11219131/bf40a89bf69f/10-1055-s-0044-1785190-i230003-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索