Faculty of Engineering, Universidad La Salle, 09340, Mexico City, Mexico.
Division of Research in Medical Engineering, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación "Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra", 14389, Mexico City, Mexico.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021 Feb;59(2):449-456. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02315-z. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows the assessment of stroke patients' cortical excitability and corticospinal tract integrity, which provide information regarding motor function recovery. However, the extraction of features from motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by TMS, such as amplitude and latency, is performed manually, increasing variability due to observer-dependent subjectivity. Therefore, an automatic methodology could improve MEP analysis, especially in stroke, which increases the difficulty of manual MEP measurements due to brain lesions. A methodology based on time-frequency features of stroke patients' MEPs that allows to automatically select and extract MEP amplitude and latency is proposed. The method was validated using manual measurements, performed by three experts, computed from patients' affected and unaffected hemispheres. Results showed a coincidence of 58.3 to 80% between automatic and manual MEP selection. There were no significant differences between the amplitudes and latencies computed by two of the experts with those obtained with the automatic method, for most comparisons. The median relative error of amplitudes and latencies computed by the automatic method was 5% and 23%, respectively. Therefore, the proposed method has the potential to reduce processing time and improve the computation of MEP features, by eliminating observer-dependent variability due to the subjectivity of manual measurements.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)可用于评估脑卒中患者的皮质兴奋性和皮质脊髓束完整性,为运动功能恢复提供信息。然而,TMS 诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)的特征(如振幅和潜伏期)的提取是手动完成的,由于观察者的主观性,这会增加变异性。因此,自动方法可以改善 MEP 分析,特别是在脑卒中患者中,由于脑损伤,手动 MEP 测量的难度增加。提出了一种基于脑卒中患者 MEP 的时频特征的方法,可自动选择和提取 MEP 的振幅和潜伏期。该方法使用由三位专家手动测量的脑卒中患者受影响和未受影响半球的计算结果进行了验证。结果显示,自动和手动 MEP 选择之间的一致性为 58.3%至 80%。在大多数比较中,两位专家计算的振幅和潜伏期与自动方法获得的结果之间没有显著差异。自动方法计算的振幅和潜伏期的中位数相对误差分别为 5%和 23%。因此,该方法有望通过消除手动测量的主观性引起的观察者依赖性变异性,减少处理时间并改善 MEP 特征的计算。