Vilsbøll Andreas Westh, Anderson Peter, Piercy James, Milligan Gary, Kragh Nana
LEO Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Apr;11(2):475-486. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00488-x. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder which, despite recent therapeutic developments, leads to significant burden and morbidity, impacting on daily functioning, physical and mental health, and health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of new therapeutic approaches in the treatment of moderate to severe AD and quantify subsequent differences in disease and symptom control.
Data were drawn from the 2018 Adelphi US AD Disease Specific Programme™ (DSP™), a cross-sectional survey of physicians (n = 150) and their patients with a history of moderate to severe AD (n = 749, 52.7% female, 72.1% white, mean age 40.1 ± 16.3 years). Inadequately controlled AD as rated by the physician was defined as currently flaring, and/or deteriorating/changeable AD and/or physician dissatisfaction with disease control on current treatment.
The overall inadequate control rate was 42.3%, an improvement from 58.7% as identified in the 2014 DSP survey. The proportion of inadequately controlled patients increased as physician subjective severity (ranked from mild through to severe) increased; 15.4% of patients classified as having mild disease were inadequately controlled, compared to 94.5% of patients classified with severe disease. Relative to patients with controlled disease, patients with inadequately controlled disease were more likely to be unemployed, reported more frequent flares, and had a greater burden of symptoms and worse quality of life measures including itch, stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance (all p < 0.0001).
Despite the introduction of new therapies, the burden and impact of AD and lack of symptom control, although reduced compared with previous studies, still remains high.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,尽管近年来治疗方法有所发展,但仍会导致巨大负担和发病率,影响日常功能、身心健康以及与健康相关的生活质量。本研究的目的是调查新治疗方法对中度至重度AD治疗的影响,并量化疾病和症状控制方面的后续差异。
数据来自2018年美国阿德尔菲特应性皮炎疾病特定项目(DSP™),这是一项针对医生(n = 150)及其有中度至重度AD病史患者(n = 749,女性占52.7%,白人占72.1%,平均年龄40.1±16.3岁)的横断面调查。医生评定为控制不佳的AD定义为当前正在发作,和/或AD病情恶化/多变,和/或医生对当前治疗的疾病控制不满意。
总体控制不佳率为42.3%,较2014年DSP调查中确定的58.7%有所改善。随着医生主观严重程度(从轻到重分级)增加,控制不佳患者的比例也增加;分类为轻度疾病的患者中有15.4%控制不佳,而分类为重度疾病的患者中这一比例为94.5%。与疾病得到控制的患者相比,控制不佳的患者更有可能失业,报告发作更频繁,症状负担更重,生活质量指标更差,包括瘙痒、压力、焦虑、抑郁和睡眠障碍(所有p < 0.0001)。
尽管引入了新疗法,但AD的负担和影响以及症状控制不佳的情况,虽然与以往研究相比有所降低,但仍然很高。