Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Department of Dermatology and the Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Aug 1;154(8):903-912. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1572.
Real-world data are limited on the patient-reported burden of adult atopic dermatitis (AD).
To characterize the patient-reported burden of AD with regard to impact of disease severity and inadequate control in adults from clinical settings.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study using data from 6 academic medical centers in the United States collected by a self-administered internet-based questionnaire, 1519 adult patients with AD were stratified by AD severity as mild or moderate/severe using the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD). Patients with moderate/severe disease using systemic immunomodulators/phototherapy were further stratified as having adequate or inadequate disease control. Strata were compared for all outcomes.
Outcomes included validated measures and stand-alone questions assessing itch (pruritus numerical rating scale; PO-SCORAD itch visual analog scale), pain (numerical rating scale), sleep (PO-SCORAD sleep visual analog scale; sleep interference with function), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and health-related quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index).
Among the 1519 adult patients with AD, relative to mild AD (n = 689, 64% women; mean [SD] age, 46.5 [18.0] years), patients with moderate/severe AD (n = 830, 66.8% women; mean [SD] age, 45.1 [16.9] years) reported more severe itching and pain, greater adverse effects on sleep, higher prevalence of anxiety and depression (417 [50.2%] vs 188 [27.3%]), and greater health-related quality-of-life impairment. The 103 patients with moderate/severe AD with inadequate disease control despite treatment with systemic immunomodulators or phototherapy (55.7%) reported higher burdens of itch and sleeping symptoms vs patients with controlled disease including more days per week with itchy skin (5.7 vs 2.7) and higher proportions with itch duration greater than half a day (190 [22.8%] vs 20 [2.9%]). Sleep symptoms included trouble sleeping (3.9 vs 1.1 on the PO-SCORAD VAS), longer sleep latency (38.8 vs 21.6 minutes), more frequent sleep disturbances (2.6 vs 0.4 nights in past week), and greater need for over-the-counter sleep medications (324 [39%] vs 145 [21%]).
Inadequate disease control was common among patients with moderate/severe AD, and was associated with a higher patient-reported burden than patients with controlled disease. Regardless of disease control, the burden of moderate/severe AD was higher than mild AD, suggesting a need for more effective therapies for moderate/severe disease.
关于成人特应性皮炎(AD)患者的报告负担,真实世界的数据有限。
描述临床环境中成人 AD 严重程度和控制不佳对患者报告负担的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项使用美国 6 个学术医疗中心通过自我管理的互联网问卷调查数据进行的横断面研究中,1519 例 AD 成人患者根据患者导向评分特应性皮炎(PO-SCORAD)被分为轻度或中重度/重度。使用全身性免疫调节剂/光疗的中重度疾病患者进一步分为有充分或不充分疾病控制的患者。比较各指标的差异。
结局包括经过验证的评估瘙痒(瘙痒数字评分量表;PO-SCORAD 瘙痒视觉模拟量表)、疼痛(数字评分量表)、睡眠(PO-SCORAD 睡眠视觉模拟量表;睡眠对功能的干扰)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)和健康相关生活质量(皮肤病生活质量指数)的指标和独立问题。
在 1519 例 AD 成年患者中,与轻度 AD(n = 689,64%女性;平均[SD]年龄,46.5[18.0]岁)相比,中重度 AD(n = 830,66.8%女性;平均[SD]年龄,45.1[16.9]岁)患者报告更严重的瘙痒和疼痛,睡眠的不良影响更大,焦虑和抑郁的患病率更高(417[50.2%] vs 188[27.3%]),生活质量受损更严重。103 例中重度 AD 患者尽管接受了全身性免疫调节剂或光疗治疗,但疾病仍未得到控制(55.7%),其瘙痒和睡眠症状负担高于控制疾病的患者,包括每周更多天出现皮肤瘙痒(5.7 vs 2.7)和更高比例瘙痒持续时间超过半天(190[22.8%] vs 20[2.9%])。睡眠症状包括入睡困难(PO-SCORAD VAS 上为 3.9 vs 1.1)、更长的睡眠潜伏期(38.8 vs 21.6 分钟)、更频繁的睡眠障碍(过去一周中 2.6 次 vs 0.4 次)和更需要非处方睡眠药物(324[39%] vs 145[21%])。
中重度 AD 患者中疾病控制不佳很常见,与控制疾病的患者相比,报告负担更高。无论疾病控制如何,中重度 AD 的负担均高于轻度 AD,这表明需要更有效的中重度疾病治疗方法。