Department of Neurosciences, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Biomedical Research Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Department Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Theranostics. 2021 Jan 1;11(5):2080-2097. doi: 10.7150/thno.50701. eCollection 2021.
Synapses are the functional units of the brain. They form specific contact points that drive neuronal communication and are highly plastic in their strength, density, and shape. A carefully orchestrated balance between synaptogenesis and synaptic pruning, , the elimination of weak or redundant synapses, ensures adequate synaptic density. An imbalance between these two processes lies at the basis of multiple neuropathologies. Recent evidence has highlighted the importance of glia-neuron interactions in the synaptic unit, emphasized by glial phagocytosis of synapses and local excretion of inflammatory mediators. These findings warrant a closer look into the molecular basis of cell-signaling pathways in the different brain cells that are related to synaptic plasticity. In neurons, intracellular second messengers, such as cyclic guanosine or adenosine monophosphate (cGMP and cAMP, respectively), are known mediators of synaptic homeostasis and plasticity. Increased levels of these second messengers in glial cells slow down inflammation and neurodegenerative processes. These multi-faceted effects provide the opportunity to counteract excessive synapse loss by targeting cGMP and cAMP pathways in multiple cell types. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are specialized degraders of these second messengers, rendering them attractive targets to combat the detrimental effects of neurological disorders. Cellular and subcellular compartmentalization of the specific isoforms of PDEs leads to divergent downstream effects for these enzymes in the various central nervous system resident cell types. This review provides a detailed overview on the role of PDEs and their inhibition in the context of glia-neuron interactions in different neuropathologies characterized by synapse loss. In doing so, it provides a framework to support future research towards finding combinational therapy for specific neuropathologies.
突触是大脑的功能单位。它们形成特定的接触点,驱动神经元之间的通讯,并且在强度、密度和形状上具有高度的可塑性。突触发生和突触修剪之间的精心协调平衡,即消除弱或冗余突触的过程,确保了足够的突触密度。这两个过程之间的不平衡是多种神经病理学的基础。最近的证据强调了胶质细胞-神经元相互作用在突触单位中的重要性,突出表现在胶质细胞吞噬突触和局部排泄炎症介质上。这些发现促使我们更深入地研究与突触可塑性相关的不同脑细胞中细胞信号通路的分子基础。在神经元中,细胞内第二信使,如环鸟苷酸或单磷酸腺苷(cGMP 和 cAMP),是突触稳态和可塑性的已知介质。胶质细胞中二信使水平的升高可减缓炎症和神经退行性过程。这些多方面的作用提供了通过靶向多种细胞类型中的 cGMP 和 cAMP 途径来抵消过度突触丢失的机会。磷酸二酯酶(PDEs)是这些第二信使的专门降解酶,使它们成为对抗神经紊乱有害影响的有吸引力的靶点。PDEs 的特定同工型的细胞和亚细胞区室化导致这些酶在不同中枢神经系统驻留细胞类型中的下游效应不同。本综述详细介绍了 PDEs 及其抑制在不同以突触丢失为特征的神经病理学中胶质细胞-神经元相互作用中的作用。这样做为寻找针对特定神经病理学的组合疗法提供了一个框架。