• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
You Can Teach Every Patient: A Health Literacy and Clear Communication Curriculum for Pediatric Clerkship Students.你可以教好每一位患者:儿科实习医学生的健康素养和清晰沟通课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 22;17:11086. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11086.
2
Out of the classroom and into the community: medical students consolidate learning about health literacy through collaboration with Head Start.走出教室,走进社区:医学生通过与启蒙计划合作巩固健康素养学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 23;16:121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0635-z.
3
Using Standardized Patient Assessments to Evaluate a Health Literacy Curriculum.使用标准化患者评估来评估健康素养课程。
Fam Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):52-57. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.539107.
4
A replicable model of a health literacy curriculum for a third-year clerkship.适用于三年级实习课程的健康素养课程的可复制模式。
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):200-10. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.692261.
5
Health-Literacy Training for First-Year Respiratory Therapy Students: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.对呼吸治疗专业一年级学生进行健康素养培训:一项混合方法的试点研究。
Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):68-74. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06896. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
Long-Term Effects of a Health Literacy Curriculum for Medical Students.医学生健康素养课程的长期影响。
Fam Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):49-53.
7
Addressing health literacy through clear health communication: a training program for internal medicine residents.通过清晰的健康沟通提高健康素养:一项针对内科住院医师的培训项目
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Parent-provider paediatric literacy communication: A curriculum for future primary care providers.家长-医生儿科读写能力沟通:未来初级保健提供者课程。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0503-8.
9
Developing Health Literacy Communication Practices for Medical Students.培养医学生的健康素养沟通实践。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 28;17:11091. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11091.
10
A Pediatric Resident Curriculum for the Use of Health Literacy Communication Tools.儿科住院医师使用健康素养沟通工具课程。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e121-e127. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220517-01. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Literacy Curricula in Pediatric Residency Programs: A National Survey.儿科住院医师培训项目中的健康素养课程:一项全国性调查。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2025 Jan;9(1):e3-e7. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240813-01. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
A Game-Based Tool for Reducing Jargon Use by Medical Trainees.基于游戏的工具可减少医学实习生使用行话。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Jun 7;20:11411. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11411. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of innovative instructional module for professional competence in health literacy in medical students.创新教学模块对医学生健康素养专业能力的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03252-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Literacy and Clear Bedside Communication: A Curricular Intervention for Internal Medicine Physicians and Medicine Nurses.健康素养与清晰的床边沟通:针对内科医生和内科护士的课程干预
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Jan 18;15:10795. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10795.
2
Using Standardized Patient Assessments to Evaluate a Health Literacy Curriculum.使用标准化患者评估来评估健康素养课程。
Fam Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):52-57. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.539107.
3
Development and Implementation of a Health Literacy Training Program for Medical Residents.面向住院医师的健康素养培训项目的开发与实施
Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v11i.4612.
4
Long-Term Effects of a Health Literacy Curriculum for Medical Students.医学生健康素养课程的长期影响。
Fam Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):49-53.
5
Teaching patient-centered communication skills: a telephone follow-up curriculum for medical students.教授以患者为中心的沟通技巧:医学生的电话随访课程。
Med Educ Online. 2014 Apr 25;19:22522. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.22522. eCollection 2014.
6
Addressing health literacy through clear health communication: a training program for internal medicine residents.通过清晰的健康沟通提高健康素养:一项针对内科住院医师的培训项目
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Health literacy teaching in US medical schools, 2010.2010年美国医学院校的健康素养教学
Fam Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(7):504-7.
8
The retrospective pre-post: a practical method to evaluate learning from an educational program.回顾性前后研究:一种从教育项目中评估学习效果的实用方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):189-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01270.x.
9
Development and evaluation of a medication counseling workshop for physicians: can we improve on 'take two pills and call me in the morning'?医生用药咨询培训课程的开发与评估:我们能否做得更好,而不是“吃两片药,早上给我打电话”?
Med Educ Online. 2011;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.7133. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview.刻意练习与专家级表现的习得:综述
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):988-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

你可以教好每一位患者:儿科实习医学生的健康素养和清晰沟通课程。

You Can Teach Every Patient: A Health Literacy and Clear Communication Curriculum for Pediatric Clerkship Students.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine and St. Christopher's Hospital for Children.

Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Children's Hospital at Montefiore.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 22;17:11086. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11086.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11086
PMID:33501376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7821440/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Poor health literacy has a negative impact on various health care outcomes. Medical schools are not consistently providing health literacy training; when they do, they overly rely on didactics.

METHODS

Our curriculum for third-year pediatric clerkship students taught principles of health literacy and evidence-supported clear communication strategies. Communication skills were structured on a novel mnemonic: CTEP (clear language, teach-back, effectively encouraging questions, and pictures). The curriculum included a 30-minute didactic, followed 1-2 weeks later by a 90-minute interactive workshop. All 188 clerkship students attended the didactic lecture; approximately half (90) attended the follow-up workshop. All students completed a formative objective structured clinical encounter. Standardized patients then evaluated students' use of the four clear communication skills. Students completed a survey to assess confidence, knowledge, and use of the skills.

RESULTS

Compared to the didactic-only group, students in the didactic + workshop group more frequently used teach-back (53% vs. 27%, < .01) and pictures (46% vs. 10%, < .01). In addition, the didactic + workshop group had improved recall, self-reported use, and comfort with the skills. The didactic + workshop group solicited questions from the standardized patient less often, and there was no difference in use of clear language between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

An interactive curriculum in health literacy and clear communication for pediatric clerkship students was superior to a didactic alone. Optimizing instructional methods for health literacy skills can help future physicians properly communicate with their patients to improve health outcomes.

摘要

简介

健康素养较差对各种医疗保健结果都有负面影响。医学院校并未始终如一地提供健康素养培训;即使提供了培训,也过于依赖讲授法。

方法

我们为三年级儿科学实习学生设计的课程教授健康素养和循证清晰沟通策略的原则。沟通技巧基于新颖的助记符:CTEP(清晰的语言、回授、有效鼓励提问和图片)。课程包括 30 分钟的讲座,1-2 周后进行 90 分钟的互动研讨会。所有 188 名实习学生都参加了讲座;大约一半(90 名)参加了后续研讨会。所有学生都完成了形成性客观结构化临床遭遇。标准化患者随后评估了学生使用四项清晰沟通技巧的情况。学生完成了一项调查,以评估他们对这些技能的信心、知识和使用情况。

结果

与仅讲座组相比,讲座+研讨会组的学生更频繁地使用回授(53%比 27%,<0.01)和图片(46%比 10%,<0.01)。此外,讲座+研讨会组在技能的回忆、自我报告使用和舒适度方面都有所提高。讲座+研讨会组向标准化患者提问的频率较低,两组在使用清晰语言方面没有差异。

讨论

针对儿科学实习学生的健康素养和清晰沟通的互动课程优于单独的讲座。优化健康素养技能的教学方法可以帮助未来的医生与患者进行适当的沟通,从而改善健康结果。