Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, VA Office of Rural Health, and Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) at the Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2315-2322. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06536-0. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
In 2015, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) incorporated nurse practitioners (NPs) into remote triage call centers to supplement registered nurse (RN)-handled calls.
To assess 7-day healthcare use following telephone triage by NPs compared to RNs. We hypothesized that NP clinical decision ability may reduce follow-up healthcare.
Retrospective observational comparative effectiveness study of clinical and administrative databases. NP routed calls were matched to RN calls based on chief complaint with propensity score matching and multivariate count data models, adjusting for differences in call severity and patient comorbidity.
Callers to a VHA regional call center, April 2015 to March 2019.
Primary care, specialty care, and emergency department (ED) visits plus hospitalizations within 7 days.
NP-handled calls (N = 1554) were matched to RN calls (N = 48,024) for the same chief complaint. NP-handled calls, compared to RNs, had lower comorbidities, fewer hospitalizations, and less urgent complaints. Seven-day healthcare use was lower for NP compared to RN calls for specialty care (0.15 vs. 0.20 visits per person [VPP]; p < 0.001), ED (0.11 vs. 0.27 VPP; p < 0.001), and hospitalizations (0.01 vs. 0.04 VPP; p < 0.001), but not primary care (0.43 vs. 0.42 VPP; p = 0.80). In adjusted analyses, estimated avoided in-person visits per 100 calls routed to NPs were 0.7 primary care visits (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4, 1.0), 2.6 specialty care visits (95% CI 0.0, 5.1), 5.9 ED visits (95% CI 2.7, 9.1), and 1.4 hospital stays (95% CI 0.1, 2.6). Propensity score-matched models comparing NP (N = 1533) to RN (N = 2646) calls had adjusted odds ratios for 7-day healthcare use of 0.75 (primary care), 0.75 (specialty care), and 0.73 (ED) (all p < 0.003).
Incorporating NPs into a call center was associated with lower in-person healthcare use in the subsequent 7 days compared to routine RN-triaged calls.
2015 年,退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)将护士从业者(NPs)纳入远程分诊呼叫中心,以补充注册护士(RN)处理的呼叫。
评估与 RN 相比,NP 进行电话分诊后 7 天内的医疗保健使用情况。我们假设 NP 的临床决策能力可能会减少后续的医疗保健。
对临床和行政数据库进行回顾性观察性比较有效性研究。根据主要诉求,将 NP 路由的呼叫与 RN 呼叫进行匹配,并使用倾向评分匹配和多变量计数数据模型进行匹配,以调整呼叫严重程度和患者合并症的差异。
2015 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月间,向 VHA 区域呼叫中心致电的人员。
7 天内的初级保健、专科保健和急诊部(ED)就诊以及住院情况。
NP 处理的呼叫(N = 1554)与 RN 处理的呼叫(N = 48024)进行了相同的主要诉求匹配。与 RN 相比,NP 处理的呼叫合并症较少,住院治疗较少,且病情不那么紧急。与 RN 相比,NP 处理的呼叫在专科保健(0.15 次 vs. 0.20 次就诊/人[VPP];p < 0.001)、ED(0.11 次 vs. 0.27 次 VPP;p < 0.001)和住院治疗(0.01 次 vs. 0.04 次 VPP;p < 0.001)方面的 7 天医疗保健使用频率较低,但初级保健(0.43 次 vs. 0.42 次 VPP;p = 0.80)无显著差异。在调整分析中,估计每 100 次路由到 NP 的避免面对面就诊的就诊次数为 0.7 次初级保健就诊(95%CI 0.4,1.0)、2.6 次专科保健就诊(95%CI 0.0,5.1)、5.9 次 ED 就诊(95%CI 2.7,9.1)和 1.4 次住院治疗(95%CI 0.1,2.6)。比较 NP(N = 1533)与 RN(N = 2646)呼叫的倾向评分匹配模型的调整后,7 天医疗保健使用的优势比为 0.75(初级保健)、0.75(专科保健)和 0.73(ED)(均 p < 0.003)。
与常规 RN 分诊呼叫相比,将 NPs 纳入呼叫中心与随后 7 天内的门诊医疗保健使用率较低相关。