Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):310-320. doi: 10.1111/acem.14681. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
Use of acute care telemedicine is growing, but data on quality, utilization, and cost are limited. We evaluated a Veterans Affairs (VA) tele-emergency care (tele-EC) pilot aimed at reducing reliance on out-of-network (OON) emergency department (ED) care, a growing portion of VA spending. With this service, an emergency physician virtually evaluated selected Veterans calling a nurse triage line.
Calls to the triage line occurring January-December 2021 and advised to seek care acutely within 24 h were included. We described tele-EC user characteristics, common triage complaints, and patterns in referral to and management by tele-EC. The primary outcome was acute care visits (ED, urgent care, and hospitalizations at VA and OON sites) within 7 days of the index call. Secondary outcomes included mortality, OON acute care spending, and the effect of tele-EC visit modality (phone vs. video). We used both standard regression and instrumental variable (IV) analysis, using the tele-EC physician schedule as the instrument.
Of 7845 eligible calls, 15.5% had a tele-EC visit, with case resolution documented in 57%. Compared to standard nurse triage, tele-EC users were less likely to be Black, had more prior ED visits, and were triaged as higher acuity. Calls concerning dizziness/syncope, blood in stool, and chest pain were most likely to have a tele-EC visit. Tele-EC was associated with fewer ED visits than standard nurse triage in both regression (average marginal effect [AME] -16.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -19.2 to -14.4) and IV analyses (AME -17.5%, 95% CI -25.1 to -9.8), lower hospitalization rate (AME -3.1%, 95% CI -6.2 to -0.0), and lower OON spending (AME -$248, 95% CI -$458 to -$38).
Among Veterans initially advised to seek care within 24 h, use of tele-EC compared to standard phone triage led to decreased ED visits, hospitalizations, and OON spending within 7 days.
急性护理远程医疗的使用正在增加,但关于其质量、利用率和成本的数据有限。我们评估了退伍军人事务部(VA)的一项远程紧急护理(远程 EC)试点计划,该计划旨在减少对非联网(OON)急诊部门(ED)护理的依赖,这是 VA 支出的一个不断增长的部分。通过这项服务,急诊医生可以远程评估拨打护士分诊线的选定退伍军人。
包括 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间拨打分诊线并建议在 24 小时内紧急就诊的患者。我们描述了远程 EC 用户的特征、常见分诊投诉以及向远程 EC 转诊和管理的模式。主要结果是在索引呼叫后 7 天内进行急性护理就诊(VA 和 OON 站点的 ED、紧急护理和住院)。次要结果包括死亡率、OON 急性护理支出,以及远程 EC 就诊方式(电话与视频)的影响。我们同时使用了标准回归和工具变量(IV)分析,使用远程 EC 医生的日程安排作为工具。
在 7845 名符合条件的呼叫中,有 15.5%进行了远程 EC 就诊,其中 57%记录了病例解决情况。与标准护士分诊相比,远程 EC 用户不太可能是黑人,他们之前的 ED 就诊次数更多,分诊时的病情更严重。涉及头晕/晕厥、大便带血和胸痛的呼叫最有可能进行远程 EC 就诊。与标准护士分诊相比,在回归分析(平均边际效应 [AME] -16.8%,95%置信区间 [CI] -19.2 至 -14.4)和 IV 分析(AME -17.5%,95% CI -25.1 至 -9.8)中,远程 EC 就诊与较少的 ED 就诊、较低的住院率(AME -3.1%,95% CI -6.2 至 -0.0)和较低的 OON 支出(AME -$248,95% CI -$458 至 -$38)相关。
在最初建议在 24 小时内就诊的退伍军人中,与标准电话分诊相比,使用远程 EC 导致 7 天内的 ED 就诊、住院和 OON 支出减少。