Suppr超能文献

在德里进行的一项社区随机对照调查(DEDICOM-II)中发现糖尿病护理质量较差:一场危机,也是一个机会。

The poor quality of diabetes care in a cluster randomized community survey from Delhi (DEDICOM-II): A crisis, an opportunity.

机构信息

Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2021 Sep;38(9):e14530. doi: 10.1111/dme.14530. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the quality of care in known diabetes patients of Delhi.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster design. In all, 30 of 150 wards were chosen in Stage 1 (using a random computer-generated seed value and then selecting wards at a predefined sampling interval; Probability Proportionate to Size-Systematic) and one colony from each ward was selected randomly in Stage 2. The selected areas were surveyed house-to-house in one-of-four random directions to recruit a minimum of 25 subjects (known diabetes ≥1 year; 35-65 years of age) per area. Data were collected by interview, blood sampling and from medical records by specifically trained research staff.

RESULTS

A total of 843 subjects (of 1315 eligible) were enrolled from 11,490 houses. For the intermediate outcome measures, an estimated 33.5% (95% CI 27.3-40.2) had an HbA value >10%, 67.2% (95% CI 62.8-71.4) had an LDL cholesterol level >100 mg/dl and 57.3% (95% CI 50.4-63.9) had BP levels >140/90 mmHg. For the processes of care in the last 1 year, 25.6% (95% CI 19.7-32.6) of the patients had an HbA (A1c) estimation and 2.4% (95% CI 1.1-4.9) had a dilated eye examination and 4.1% (95% CI 2.6-6.2) had foot examination. Diabetes self-management education was provided to only 11.3% (95% CI 8.6-14.7) while nutrition counselling was provided to 56.0% (95% CI 51.7-60.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The glycaemic control, lipid control and BP management of known diabetes patients in Delhi are unacceptably poor and a wide gap exists between practice recommendations and delivery of diabetes care in Delhi.

摘要

目的

评估德里已知糖尿病患者的护理质量。

方法

采用两阶段聚类设计进行横断面调查。第 1 阶段选择了 150 个病房中的 30 个(使用随机计算机生成的种子值,然后按照预定义的抽样间隔选择病房;概率比例系统),每个病房随机选择一个殖民地。第 2 阶段选择的区域采用四向随机方向之一进行逐户调查,每个区域至少招募 25 名受试者(已知糖尿病≥1 年;35-65 岁)。数据通过专门培训的研究人员通过访谈、血液采样和病历收集。

结果

从 1315 名合格居民中,共招募了 843 名居民(共 11490 户)。对于中间结果测量,估计有 33.5%(95%CI 27.3-40.2)的 HbA 值>10%,67.2%(95%CI 62.8-71.4)的 LDL 胆固醇水平>100mg/dl,57.3%(95%CI 50.4-63.9)的血压水平>140/90mmHg。在过去 1 年的护理过程中,25.6%(95%CI 19.7-32.6)的患者进行了 HbA(A1c)估计,2.4%(95%CI 1.1-4.9)进行了眼底检查,4.1%(95%CI 2.6-6.2)进行了足部检查。仅为 11.3%(95%CI 8.6-14.7)的患者提供了糖尿病自我管理教育,而提供营养咨询的比例为 56.0%(95%CI 51.7-60.2)。

结论

德里已知糖尿病患者的血糖控制、血脂控制和血压管理非常不理想,德里的实践建议与糖尿病护理的提供之间存在很大差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验