• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同适应证行保留瓣膜的根部替换手术的结果。

Outcome of valve sparing root replacement for diverse indications.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Jun;55(3):173-179. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1869298. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1080/14017431.2020.1869298
PMID:33501855
Abstract

We report the mid-term outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) in a cohort including patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), connective tissue disorder (CTD), aortic dissection (AD), and congenital heart disease (CHD). . From 2005 to 2017, 174 patients underwent VSRR with the reimplantation technique. The mean age was 46 ± 14 years. The mean follow-up time was 4.8 ± 2.8 years. The indication for operation was aortic aneurysm for 127 (73%), aortic insufficiency (AI) for 38 (22%), and AD for 9 patients (5%). Preoperatively, 53 patients (31%) had ≥ moderate AI. BAV, CTD (Marfan or Loyes-Dietz), previous Ross procedure, or CHD was present in 57 (33%), 28 (16%), 7 (4%) and 12 patients (7%), respectively. Concomitant aortic valve repair was performed for 103 patients (59%). . Thirty-day mortality was zero. Four patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival, freedom from AVR, and freedom from ≥ moderate AI or reoperation were 96, 98, and 97% at 5 years. There was no difference in survival, freedom from AVR, or freedom from ≥ moderate AI or reoperation in patients with and without BAV, CTD, leaflet repair, or preoperative ≥ moderate AI. In Cox regression analysis, BAV, CTD, aortic valve repair, preoperative ≥ moderate AI, or aortic dimension were not risk factors for reoperation or valve dysfunction. . Mid-term outcomes of VSRR for patients with diverse indications in terms of survival, reoperation rate, and valve dysfunction rate were excellent in a center with a limited annual volume of VSSR.

摘要

我们报告了包括二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)、结缔组织疾病(CTD)、主动脉夹层(AD)和先天性心脏病(CHD)患者在内的一组患者行保留瓣膜主动脉根部替换术(VSRR)的中期结果。2005 年至 2017 年,174 例行 VSRR 手术,采用再植入技术。平均年龄为 46±14 岁。平均随访时间为 4.8±2.8 年。手术指征为主动脉瘤 127 例(73%),主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)38 例(22%),AD 9 例(5%)。术前,53 例(31%)有≥中度 AI。57 例(33%)、28 例(16%)、7 例(4%)和 12 例(7%)分别存在 BAV、CTD(马凡或洛伊茨-迪茨)、既往罗斯手术或 CHD。103 例行主动脉瓣修复术(59%)。30 天死亡率为 0。随访期间有 4 例患者行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)。5 年时,生存率、免于 AVR、免于≥中度 AI 或再次手术的 Kaplan-Meier 估计分别为 96%、98%和 97%。在有无 BAV、CTD、瓣叶修复、术前≥中度 AI 的患者中,生存率、免于 AVR、免于≥中度 AI 或再次手术无差异。在 Cox 回归分析中,BAV、CTD、主动脉瓣修复、术前≥中度 AI 或主动脉尺寸不是再次手术或瓣膜功能障碍的危险因素。在一个 VSRR 年手术量有限的中心,VSRR 治疗各种适应证的患者中期生存、再次手术率和瓣膜功能障碍率结果优异。

相似文献

1
Outcome of valve sparing root replacement for diverse indications.不同适应证行保留瓣膜的根部替换手术的结果。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Jun;55(3):173-179. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1869298. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Valve-sparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure.二叶式主动脉瓣行保留瓣膜根部的根部重植和瓣叶修复:与三尖瓣 David 手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2 Suppl):S22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.103. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
3
Aortic valve degeneration after valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortopathy or connective tissue disorder.二叶式主动脉病变或结缔组织疾病患者行保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术后的主动脉瓣退变
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun;169(6):1696-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.046. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Risk Factors for Late Aortic Valve Dysfunction After the David V Valve-Sparing Root Replacement.大卫V保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术后晚期主动脉瓣功能障碍的危险因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
Predictors of Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency in Type I Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair.I 型二叶式主动脉瓣修复术后主动脉瓣关闭不全复发的预测因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Nov;106(5):1316-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
Bicuspid Aortic Insufficiency With Aortic Root Aneurysm: Root Reimplantation Versus Bentall Root Replacement.合并主动脉根部瘤的二叶式主动脉瓣关闭不全:根部再植入术与Bentall根部置换术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.087. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Valsalva graft: what have we learnt after 100 cases?采用窦管 graft 进行保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入置换术:100 例术后我们学到了什么?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;9(1):113-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.202622. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
8
Valve-Sparing Root Replacement Provides Excellent Midterm Outcomes for Bicuspid Valve Aortopathy.保留瓣膜的根部置换为二叶瓣主动脉瓣病变提供了极好的中期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
Bicuspid-Associated Aortic Root Aneurysm: Mid to Long-Term Outcomes of David V Versus the Bio-Bentall Procedure.二叶式主动脉瓣相关主动脉根部动脉瘤:David V手术与生物Bentall手术的中长期结果
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Winter;33(4):933-943. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures.马凡综合征主动脉根部手术的长期结果:Bentall手术与保留主动脉瓣手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.068. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft.使用窦管 graft 进行主动脉瓣再植入术(David 手术)后的再次手术或主动脉瓣反流进展
Aorta (Stamford). 2023 Jun;11(3):97-106. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768968. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.对二叶式主动脉瓣患者进行大卫和亚库布手术三十年的结果——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jul 31;12(4):286-294. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome.
采用再植入(David)技术保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:关于生存和临床结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 31;12(3):149-158. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-0038.
4
Translational Medicine: Towards Gene Therapy of Marfan Syndrome.转化医学:迈向马凡综合征的基因治疗
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 6;11(14):3934. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143934.