• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新使用机动轮椅者自我报告的轮椅技能测试问卷评分的相关因素:一项横断面研究。

Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):483-490. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1874065. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1080/17483107.2021.1874065
PMID:33503387
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the subjective reported scooter-skill scores of new mobility scooter users and to identify significant correlations with other characteristics and measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre study using a cross-sectional design. Participants ( = 22) completed the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire (WST-Q) Version 4.3 for scooter users. It measures the users' perceived capacity (what the user can do), performance (what the user actually does), and confidence (or self-efficacy). Their scooter skills were also rated objectively with the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST). They completed standardised measures of cognition, hearing, vision, life space mobility, visual attention and task switching, and confidence negotiating the social environment using their scooters.

RESULTS

Mean total WST-Q capacity scores were 83% and performance scores were 25%. WST-Q capacity scores had significant positive correlations with WST-Q performance ( = 0.321) and confidence scores ( = 0.787), WST capacity scores ( = 0.488), and confidence negotiating the social environment (WheelCon) ( = 0.463). WST-Q capacity scores were significantly negatively correlated with Trail Making B scores ( = -0.591) and age ( = -0.531).

CONCLUSIONS

The correlations between WST-Q scores and other variables are similar to those found in other studies among users of scooters and other mobility devices. The gap between capacity and performance scores highlights the needs for additional skills training in this population of novice scooter users.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIn implementing scooter training for new scooter users, attention should be paid to building community-based skills for navigating both the physical and the social environment.Scooter users' age and their driving capabilities need to be taken into account when developing and delivering the training.

摘要

目的

描述新机动轮椅使用者主观报告的轮椅技能评分,并确定与其他特征和测量指标的显著相关性。

材料与方法

这是一项单中心研究,采用横断面设计。参与者(n=22)完成了针对轮椅使用者的轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)第 4.3 版。它衡量使用者的感知能力(使用者能够做什么)、表现(使用者实际做什么)和信心(或自我效能)。他们的轮椅技能也使用轮椅技能测试(WST)进行了客观评估。他们完成了认知、听力、视力、生活空间移动性、视觉注意力和任务转换以及使用轮椅自信地协商社交环境的标准化测量。

结果

平均总 WST-Q 能力评分为 83%,表现评分为 25%。WST-Q 能力评分与 WST-Q 表现评分(r=0.321)和信心评分(r=0.787)、WST 能力评分(r=0.488)和自信地协商社交环境(WheelCon)评分(r=0.463)呈显著正相关。WST-Q 能力评分与 Trail Making B 评分(r=-0.591)和年龄(r=-0.531)呈显著负相关。

结论

WST-Q 评分与其他变量之间的相关性与其他研究中在轮椅和其他移动设备使用者中发现的相关性相似。能力评分和表现评分之间的差距突出表明,在这个新的轮椅使用者群体中,需要进行额外的技能培训。

对康复的意义

在为新的轮椅使用者实施轮椅培训时,应注意为他们在物理和社会环境中导航建立基于社区的技能。在制定和提供培训时,需要考虑轮椅使用者的年龄和驾驶能力。

相似文献

1
Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.新使用机动轮椅者自我报告的轮椅技能测试问卷评分的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):483-490. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1874065. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Wheelchair Skills Test in simulated versus community settings: a mixed-methods crossover study of experienced motorized mobility scooter users.模拟环境与社区环境下的轮椅技能测试:一项针对经验丰富的电动代步车使用者的混合方法交叉研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Jul;19(5):2057-2064. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2252004. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test for scooters among experienced users.经验丰富的使用者中踏板车轮椅技能测试的测量属性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Jan;13(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1280546. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
4
Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力与表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Qualitative experiences of new motorised mobility scooter users relevant to their scooter skills: a secondary analysis.新电动代步车使用者与代步车技能相关的定性体验:一项二次分析
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jan;18(1):89-96. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2063422. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
6
Manual wheelchair skills: objective testing versus subjective questionnaire.手动轮椅技能:客观测试与主观问卷。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
Wheelchair mobility, motor performance and participation of adult wheelchair users with ARSACS: a cross-sectional study.成人肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者的轮椅移动能力、运动表现和参与度:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 May;18(4):378-386. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1858195. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
8
Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能测试问卷的测量属性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.984778. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version.轮椅技能测试,第2.4版:基于算法的问卷版本的有效性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):416-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00427-1.
10
Validity of the WST and the WST-Q in children with spina bifida: a pilot project.脊柱裂患儿中WST和WST-Q的有效性:一个试点项目。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):744-750. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1550114. Epub 2019 Jan 24.