Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Philosophy, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jun;125:122-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
In recent years, there has been a heightened interest in the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on executive functioning. However, there is no comprehensive overview of its effects on different executive functioning domains in healthy individuals. Here, we assessed the state of the field by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation (i.e. repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) over prefrontal regions on tasks assessing working memory, inhibition, flexibility, planning and initiation performance. Our search yielded 63 studies (n = 1537), and the effectiveness of excitatory and inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation were assessed per executive functioning task. Our analyses showed that excitatory non-invasive brain stimulation had a small but positive effect on Stop Signal Task and Go/No-Go Task performance, and that inhibitory stimulation had a small negative effect on Flanker Task performance. Non-invasive brain stimulation did not affect performance on working memory and flexibility tasks, and effects on planning tasks were inconclusive.
近年来,人们对非侵入性脑刺激对执行功能的影响产生了浓厚的兴趣。然而,目前还没有关于非侵入性脑刺激(即重复经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激)对健康个体不同执行功能领域影响的综合概述。在这里,我们通过对前额叶区域的非侵入性脑刺激(即重复经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激)在评估工作记忆、抑制、灵活性、计划和启动性能的任务上的有效性进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了该领域的现状。我们的搜索结果为 63 项研究(n=1537),并根据每项执行功能任务评估了兴奋性和抑制性非侵入性脑刺激的效果。我们的分析表明,兴奋性非侵入性脑刺激对停止信号任务和 Go/No-Go 任务的表现有较小但积极的影响,而抑制性刺激对侧抑制任务的表现有较小的负面影响。非侵入性脑刺激对工作记忆和灵活性任务的表现没有影响,对计划任务的影响尚无定论。