Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 15;230:117796. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117796. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
The Monetary Incentive Delay task (MID) has been used extensively to probe anticipatory reward processes. However, individual differences evident during this task may relate to other constructs such as general arousal or valence processing (i.e., anticipation of negative versus positive outcomes). This investigation used a latent variable approach to parse activation patterns during the MID within a transdiagnostic clinical sample.
Participants were drawn from the first 500 individuals recruited for the Tulsa-1000 (T1000), a naturalistic longitudinal study of 1000 participants aged 18-55 (n = 476 with MID data). We employed a multiview latent analysis method, group factor analysis, to characterize factors within and across variable sets consisting of: (1) region of interest (ROI)-based blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrasts during reward and loss anticipation; and (2) self-report measures of positive and negative valence and related constructs.
Three factors comprised of ROI indicators emerged to accounted for >43% of variance and loaded on variables representing: (1) general arousal or general activation; (2) valence, with dissociable responses to anticipation of win versus loss; and (3) region-specific activation, with dissociable activation in salience versus perceptual brain networks. Two additional factors were comprised of self-report variables, which appeared to represent arousal and valence.
Results indicate that multiview techniques to identify latent variables offer a novel approach for differentiating brain activation patterns during task engagement. Such approaches may offer insight into neural processing patterns through dimension reduction, be useful for probing individual differences, and aid in the development of optimal explanatory or predictive frameworks.
货币激励延迟任务(MID)已被广泛用于探测预期奖励过程。然而,在该任务中表现出的个体差异可能与其他结构有关,例如一般唤醒或效价处理(即,对负面与正面结果的预期)。本研究采用潜在变量方法,在一个跨诊断临床样本中解析 MID 期间的激活模式。
参与者来自塔尔萨 1000 计划(T1000)的前 500 名被招募者,这是一项针对 18-55 岁 1000 名参与者的自然主义纵向研究(n=476 名有 MID 数据)。我们采用多视图潜在分析方法,群组因子分析,以描述由以下变量集组成的因素:(1)基于感兴趣区域(ROI)的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比,在奖励和损失预期期间;(2)积极和消极效价及相关结构的自我报告测量。
三个由 ROI 指标组成的因素出现,占方差的>43%,并加载于代表以下变量:(1)一般唤醒或一般激活;(2)效价,对预期获胜与损失的反应不同;(3)区域特定激活,在突显与感知大脑网络中具有不同的激活。另外两个因素由自我报告变量组成,这些变量似乎代表唤醒和效价。
结果表明,识别潜在变量的多视图技术提供了一种区分任务参与期间大脑激活模式的新方法。这种方法可以通过降维提供对神经处理模式的洞察,有助于探究个体差异,并有助于开发最佳的解释或预测框架。