• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲晚期黑色素瘤患者采用 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂联合治疗的结果:112 例分析。

Outcome of combination therapy using BRAF and MEK inhibitors among Asian patients with advanced melanoma: An analysis of 112 cases.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.021
PMID:33503528
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As most clinical trials evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy (B + Minh) have been conducted in Western countries, little is known about the effect of B + Minh among East Asian populations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from patients with advanced melanoma treated using B + Minh (either dabrafenib + trametinib or encorafenib + binimetinib) were retrospectively collected from 16 institutes in Japan. Response rates, adverse events, patterns of failure and survival were analysed.

RESULTS

We analysed 112 of 144 collected patient records and, of these, 14 had acral/mucosal melanoma. The response rate for the entire cohort was 75.0%. There were no statistical differences in response rates between acral/mucosal and cutaneous melanomas (64.3% versus 76.5%), whereas previous treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not affect response (72.7% versus 73.9%) to B + Minh, response to ICI after B + Minh was only 20%. Patients who achieved complete response had the best overall survival rates at 24 months (94.7%). Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and 3 or more metastatic sites were independently associated with survival. The most common relapse site was the brain (17.9%). More than half of the patients (58.8%) experienced grade III/IV pyrexia.

CONCLUSION

B + Minh was effective among Japanese patients with melanoma, including those with acral/mucosal melanoma. Factors associated with survival were similar to previous Western studies. B + Minh response was not affected by the previous use of ICI; however, vigilance against brain metastasis during B + Minh therapy is required as the brain was our most commonly encountered relapse site.

摘要

背景

由于大多数评估 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂联合治疗(B + M)的临床试验都是在西方国家进行的,因此对于东亚人群中 B + M 的疗效知之甚少。

材料与方法

从日本 16 家医院回顾性收集了接受 B + M(达布拉非尼 + 曲美替尼或恩考芬尼 + 比美替尼)治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者的数据。分析了缓解率、不良反应、失败模式和生存情况。

结果

我们分析了收集到的 144 份患者记录中的 112 份,其中 14 份为肢端/黏膜黑色素瘤。全队列的缓解率为 75.0%。肢端/黏膜和皮肤黑色素瘤的缓解率无统计学差异(64.3%与 76.5%),而 B + M 之前使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)并不影响其反应(72.7%与 73.9%),B + M 后对 ICI 的反应仅为 20%。达到完全缓解的患者 24 个月的总生存率最佳(94.7%)。血清乳酸脱氢酶水平升高和 3 个或更多转移部位与生存相关。最常见的复发部位是大脑(17.9%)。超过一半的患者(58.8%)发生 3 级/4 级发热。

结论

B + M 对日本黑色素瘤患者有效,包括肢端/黏膜黑色素瘤患者。与既往西方研究相似,生存相关因素。B + M 之前使用 ICI 不影响其反应;然而,在 B + M 治疗期间需要警惕脑转移,因为大脑是我们最常见的复发部位。

相似文献

1
Outcome of combination therapy using BRAF and MEK inhibitors among Asian patients with advanced melanoma: An analysis of 112 cases.亚洲晚期黑色素瘤患者采用 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂联合治疗的结果:112 例分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
2
Real-world efficacy and safety of BRAF-targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: A single-center retrospective study in Japan.真实世界中 BRAF 靶向治疗对晚期黑色素瘤患者的疗效和安全性:日本单中心回顾性研究。
J Dermatol. 2024 Sep;51(9):1199-1207. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17263. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼用于治疗 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者(COLUMBUS):一项多中心、开放标签、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):603-615. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30142-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Open-label, phase IIa study of dabrafenib plus trametinib in East Asian patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant cutaneous melanoma.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗晚期 BRAF V600 突变型皮肤黑色素瘤东亚患者的开放性、Ib 期研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Aug;135:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.接受恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼治疗的 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的总生存期:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期试验(COLUMBUS)。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30497-2. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Severe pyrexia from nivolumab-resistant advanced melanoma after successful combined therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib.纳武利尤单抗耐药的晚期黑色素瘤患者在恩考芬尼联合比美替尼治疗后出现严重发热。
J Dermatol. 2020 Jun;47(6):654-657. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15346. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Triplet combination of BRAF, MEK and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in melanoma: the more the better?BRAF、MEK 和 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断的三联组合在黑色素瘤中的应用:越多越好?
Curr Opin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;33(2):133-138. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000709.
8
Five-Year Outcomes with Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Metastatic Melanoma.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗转移性黑色素瘤的 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):626-636. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904059. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
Recent developments and obstacles in the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂治疗黑色素瘤的最新进展和障碍。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 May;125:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Adverse events associated with encorafenib plus binimetinib in the COLUMBUS study: incidence, course and management.COLUMBUS 研究中恩考芬尼联合比尼替尼相关的不良反应:发生率、病程和处理。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;119:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Acral Melanoma.靶向黑色素瘤细胞粘附分子作为肢端黑色素瘤的一种新型治疗方法。
Exp Dermatol. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70164. doi: 10.1111/exd.70164.
2
KS-NailMel-1: a novel cell line of nail apparatus melanoma.KS-NailMel-1:一种新型的甲襞黑色素瘤细胞系。
Hum Cell. 2025 May 28;38(4):112. doi: 10.1007/s13577-025-01242-7.
3
Acral Melanoma: A Review of Its Pathogenesis, Progression, and Management.肢端黑色素瘤:发病机制、进展及治疗综述
Biomolecules. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):120. doi: 10.3390/biom15010120.
4
A Narrative Review of the Evolution of Diagnostic Techniques and Treatment Strategies for Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.肢端雀斑样黑素瘤的诊断技术和治疗策略的演变:叙述性回顾。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 27;25(19):10414. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910414.
5
The Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in Different Therapy Lines for Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Study.免疫检查点抑制剂和BRAF/MEK抑制剂在转移性黑色素瘤不同治疗线中的评估:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5560. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185560.
6
Single-arm study of camrelizumab plus apatinib for patients with advanced mucosal melanoma.卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗晚期黏膜黑色素瘤的单臂研究。
J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Jun 21;12(6):e008611. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008611.
7
Current State of Melanoma Therapy and Next Steps: Battling Therapeutic Resistance.黑色素瘤治疗的现状与后续步骤:对抗治疗耐药性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 19;16(8):1571. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081571.
8
Multidisciplinary approach and treatment of acral and mucosal melanoma.肢端和黏膜黑色素瘤的多学科治疗方法
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 26;14:1340408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1340408. eCollection 2024.
9
Deciphering the role of adjuvant therapy in melanoma and its actual benefits.解读辅助治疗在黑色素瘤中的作用及其实际益处。
J Dermatol. 2024 Mar;51(3):335-342. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17093. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
Optimal strategy in managing advanced melanoma.晚期黑色素瘤管理的最佳策略。
J Dermatol. 2024 Mar;51(3):324-334. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17068. Epub 2023 Dec 12.