Woo Soo Jin, Ha Jeong Hyun, Jin Ung Sik
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Arch Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;48(1):33-43. doi: 10.5999/aps.2020.01522. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have become an essential material for implant-based breast reconstruction. No previous studies have evaluated the effects of sterility of ADM under conditions of radiation. This study compared sterile (irradiated) and aseptic (non-irradiated) ADMs to determine which would better endure radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighteen male Balb/C mice were assigned to the control group with no irradiation (group 1) or one of two other groups with a radiation intensity of 10 Gy (group 2) or 20 Gy (group 3). Both sterile and aseptic ADMs were inserted into the back of each mouse. The residual volume of the ADM (measured using three-dimensional photography), cell incorporation, α-smooth muscle actin expression, and connective tissue growth factor expression were evaluated. The thickness and CD3 expression of the skin were measured 4 and 8 weeks after radiation. RESULTS: In groups 2 and 3, irradiated ADMs had a significantly larger residual volume than the non-irradiated ADMs after 8 weeks (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in cell incorporation and the amount of fibrosis between irradiated and non-irradiated ADMs. The skin was significantly thicker in the non-irradiated ADMs than in the irradiated ADMs in group 3 (P<0.05). CD3 staining showed significantly fewer inflammatory cells in the skin of irradiated ADMs than in non-irradiated ADMs in all three groups after 4 and 8 weeks (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under radiation exposure, irradiated ADMs were more durable, with less volume decrease and less deposition of collagen fibers and inflammatory reactions in the skin than in non-irradiated ADMs.
背景:脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)已成为基于植入物的乳房重建的重要材料。以前没有研究评估过ADM在辐射条件下的无菌状态的影响。本研究比较了无菌(辐照)和无菌(未辐照)ADM,以确定哪种更能耐受放射治疗。 方法:将18只雄性Balb/C小鼠分为未接受辐照的对照组(第1组)或另外两组中辐射强度为10 Gy的一组(第2组)或20 Gy的一组(第3组)。将无菌和无菌ADM均植入每只小鼠的背部。评估ADM的残余体积(使用三维摄影测量)、细胞掺入、α-平滑肌肌动蛋白表达和结缔组织生长因子表达。在辐射后4周和8周测量皮肤的厚度和CD3表达。 结果:在第2组和第3组中,辐照后的ADM在8周后残余体积明显大于未辐照的ADM(P<0.05)。辐照和未辐照的ADM在细胞掺入和纤维化程度方面未发现显著差异。在第3组中,未辐照的ADM中的皮肤明显比辐照后的ADM厚(P<0.05)。CD3染色显示,在4周和8周后,所有三组中辐照后的ADM皮肤中的炎症细胞明显少于未辐照的ADM(P<0.05)。 结论:在辐射暴露下,辐照后的ADM更耐用,与未辐照的ADM相比,体积减小更少,皮肤中胶原纤维沉积和炎症反应更少。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016-7-22
Gland Surg. 2016-4
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017-5
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019-4-23
Semin Plast Surg. 2019-11
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2024-9-1
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019-8-8
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016-7-22
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016-6-28
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014-4-7