Supine Traction Versus Prone Bending Radiographs for Assessing the Curve Flexibility in Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

No consensus exists among surgeons on which radiologic method to prefer for the assessment of curve flexibility in spinal deformity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in curve correction on supine traction radiographs versus prone side bending radiographs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of idiopathic scoliosis (IS), degenerative idiopathic scoliosis (DIS) and de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS) patients was performed on supine traction as well as prone bending films (when available). Age, weight, traction force, diagnosis and Cobb angles of the primary and secondary curves were extracted. Differences in curve correction (percentages) on traction versus prone bending radiographs were analyzed for the primary and secondary curve. Subgroup analyses were performed for the 3 different diagnoses.

RESULTS

In total, 170 patients were eligible for inclusion. 43 were diagnosed with IS, 58 with DIS and 69 with DNDLS. For the primary curve, greater curve correction was obtained with bending in the DNDLS group ( < 0.001). In the DIS group, there was a trend toward more correction on bending ( = 0.054). In de IS group no difference was found. For the secondary curve, bending showed more curve correction in the IS and DIS group ( = 0.002 and <0.001). No difference was found in the DNDLS group.

CONCLUSION

Compared to traction radiographs, bending radiographs better serve the purpose of curve flexibility assessment of IS, DIS and DNDLS spinal deformity, despite the fact that patients are exposed to more radiation.