Suppr超能文献

Cobb角的观察者间和观察者内可靠性评估:手动测量工具与数字测量工具的比较

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.

作者信息

Gstoettner Michaela, Sekyra Katrin, Walochnik Nadja, Winter Peter, Wachter Roland, Bach Christian M

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1587-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of end vertebra definition and Cobb angle measurement using printed and digital radiographs of 48 patients with scoliosis. The Cobb angle and the end vertebra were assessed by six observers in 48 patients with scoliosis using printed and digital radiographs. Definition of end vertebra and measurement of the Cobb angle was repeated three times with a 3 week interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities. 95% prediction limits for the errors in measurements are provided. For the Cobb angle a mean ICC of 0.97 was determined for intra- and interobserver reliability measurement of the printed radiographs. For the electronic radiographs a mean ICC value of 0.93 was determined for interobserver reliability and a mean ICC value of 0.96 for intraobserver reliability. Intraobserver ICC for definition of end vertebrae was 0.8 for both methods. Interobserver ICC was 0.83 for the manual and 0.74 in the digital method. One pitfall in angle measurement implies the Cobb method itself which measures in two dimensions. Until we develop a proper tri-dimensional measuring system an error is introduced. For the Cobb angle measurement the definition of end vertebrae introduces the main source of error. Digital radiography does not improve the measurement accuracy.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用48例脊柱侧弯患者的纸质和数字X线片,确定终椎定义和Cobb角测量的观察者内及观察者间可靠性。6名观察者使用纸质和数字X线片对48例脊柱侧弯患者的Cobb角和终椎进行评估。终椎的定义和Cobb角的测量重复进行3次,间隔3周。使用组内相关系数(ICC)来确定观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。提供了测量误差的95%预测限。对于Cobb角,纸质X线片观察者内和观察者间可靠性测量的平均ICC为0.97。对于电子X线片,观察者间可靠性的平均ICC值为0.93,观察者内可靠性的平均ICC值为0.96。两种方法终椎定义的观察者内ICC均为0.8。手动方法的观察者间ICC为0.83,数字方法为0.74。角度测量中的一个缺陷意味着Cobb方法本身是二维测量。在我们开发出合适的三维测量系统之前,会引入误差。对于Cobb角测量,终椎的定义是误差的主要来源。数字X线摄影并未提高测量准确性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis.X线测量在脊柱侧凸中的意义。
J Pediatr Orthop. 1982 Oct;2(4):378-82. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198210000-00005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验