• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面罩与鼻塞或鼻咽通气管用于产房新生儿复苏的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Face mask versus nasal prong or nasopharyngeal tube for neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Sep;106(5):561-567. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319460. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2020-319460
PMID:33504574
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend positive pressure ventilation via face mask or nasal prongs at birth. Using a nasal interface may have the potential to improve outcomes for newborn infants.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nasal prong/nasopharyngeal tube versus face mask during positive pressure ventilation of infants born <37 weeks' gestation in the delivery room reduces in-hospital mortality and morbidity.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (through PubMed), Google Scholar and EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing nasal prong/nasopharyngeal tube versus face mask during positive pressure ventilation of infants born <37 weeks' gestation in the delivery room.

DATA ANALYSIS

Risk of bias was assessed using the Covidence Collaboration Tool, results were pooled into a meta-analysis using a random effects model.

MAIN OUTCOME

In-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Five RCTs enrolling 873 infants were combined into a meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in in-hospital mortality (risk ratio (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.52, p=0.92, I=11%), rate of chest compressions in the delivery room (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.33, p=0.13, I=28%), rate of intraventricular haemorrhage (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.70, p=0.13, I=0%) or delivery room intubations in infants ventilated with a nasal prong/tube (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39,1.02, p=0.06, I=52%).

CONCLUSION

In infants born <37 weeks' gestation, in-hospital mortality and morbidity were similar following positive pressure ventilation during initial stabilisation with a nasal prong/tube or a face mask.

摘要

重要性

目前的新生儿复苏指南建议在出生时通过面罩或鼻叉进行正压通气。使用鼻接口可能有潜力改善新生儿的结局。

目的

确定在产房对 <37 周胎龄的婴儿进行正压通气时,使用鼻叉/鼻咽管与面罩相比,是否可以降低院内死亡率和发病率。

数据来源

通过 PubMed 检索 MEDLINE、Google Scholar 和 EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,检索时间截至 2019 年 8 月。

研究选择

比较产房内 <37 周胎龄婴儿正压通气时使用鼻叉/鼻咽管与面罩的随机对照试验。

数据分析

使用 Covidence 协作工具评估偏倚风险,使用随机效应模型对结果进行汇总分析。

主要结局

院内死亡率。

结果

纳入了 5 项 RCT 共 873 名婴儿,将其合并进行 meta 分析。院内死亡率无统计学差异(风险比(RR)0.98,95%置信区间(CI)0.63 至 1.52,p=0.92,I=11%),产房内胸外按压率(RR 0.37,95% CI 0.10 至 1.33,p=0.13,I=28%)、脑室内出血率(RR 1.54,95% CI 0.88 至 2.70,p=0.13,I=0%)或使用鼻叉/管通气的婴儿在产房内进行气管插管的比例(RR 0.63,95% CI 0.39 至 1.02,p=0.06,I=52%)也无统计学差异。

结论

在 <37 周胎龄的婴儿中,使用鼻叉/管或面罩进行初始稳定正压通气后,院内死亡率和发病率相似。

相似文献

1
Face mask versus nasal prong or nasopharyngeal tube for neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.面罩与鼻塞或鼻咽通气管用于产房新生儿复苏的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Sep;106(5):561-567. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319460. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Nasal interfaces for neonatal resuscitation.新生儿复苏的鼻接口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 3;10(10):CD009102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009102.pub2.
3
A randomized trial of nasal prong or face mask for respiratory support for preterm newborns.经鼻持续气道正压通气或鼻塞与面罩吸氧用于早产儿呼吸支持的随机试验
Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):e389-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0446. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation.喉罩气道与面罩通气或气管插管用于新生儿复苏的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD003314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003314.pub3.
5
Respiratory function monitoring to improve the outcomes following neonatal resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.呼吸功能监测以改善新生儿复苏后的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Nov;107(6):589-596. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323017. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)用于早产儿拔管后
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4(9):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub2.
7
Mask versus nasal tube for stabilization of preterm infants at birth: a randomized controlled trial.口罩与鼻管在稳定早产儿出生时的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):e381-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0361. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
Comparing Intubation Rates in the Delivery Room by Interface.比较不同接口在产房内的插管率。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Jul;41(10):1424-1431. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769469. Epub 2023 May 31.
9
Mask versus Prongs for Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)中鼻塞与鼻塞式气道正压(NIPPV)的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neonatology. 2019;116(2):100-114. doi: 10.1159/000496462. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Interfaces for non-invasive neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room: A systematic review and meta-analysis.产房非侵入性新生儿复苏的接口:系统评价与荟萃分析
Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomised In Vitro Study Investigating PEEP-Stability During Application of CPAP With Binasal Prongs and Face Masks.关于使用双鼻插管和面罩进行持续气道正压通气(CPAP)时呼气末正压(PEEP)稳定性的随机体外研究
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jun;114(6):1432-1436. doi: 10.1111/apa.17589. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
2
Blinding Assessments in Neonatal Ventilation Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Meta-Epidemiological Review.新生儿通气荟萃分析中的盲法评估:一项系统的Meta-流行病学综述
Neonatology. 2024;121(6):659-666. doi: 10.1159/000539203. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Skin-to-skin stabilisation and uninterrupted respiratory support for preterm infants after birth: feasibility of a new and simplified rPAP system.
皮肤接触稳定和不间断呼吸支持在早产儿出生后的应用:新型简化 rPAP 系统的可行性。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Oct 18;109(6):638-642. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326409.
4
Rescue nasopharyngeal tube for preterm infants non-responsive to initial ventilation after birth.复苏鼻塞管用于出生后对初始通气无反应的早产儿。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jul;96(1):141-147. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03033-6. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
5
Nasal interfaces for neonatal resuscitation.新生儿复苏的鼻接口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 3;10(10):CD009102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009102.pub2.
6
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南:2022 年更新版。
Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3-23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation-A Narrative Review of Updates 2022.新生儿复苏中的喉罩——2022年最新情况的叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2022 May 17;9(5):733. doi: 10.3390/children9050733.
8
Delivery Room Care for Premature Infants Born after Less than 25 Weeks' Gestation-A Narrative Review.孕周小于25周的早产儿产房护理——一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 2;8(10):882. doi: 10.3390/children8100882.
9
Comparison of Respiratory Support After Delivery in Infants Born Before 28 Weeks' Gestational Age: The CORSAD Randomized Clinical Trial.28 周以下胎龄出生婴儿分娩后呼吸支持的比较:CORSAD 随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Sep 1;175(9):911-918. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1497.