• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰和澳大利亚急诊剖腹手术死亡率与国际结果相比更具优势:一项系统评价。

New Zealand and Australia emergency laparotomy mortality rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systematic review.

作者信息

Fagan Georgina, Barazanchi Ahmed, Coulter Grant, Leeman Matthew, Hill Andrew G, Eglinton Tim W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2583-2591. doi: 10.1111/ans.16563. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/ans.16563
PMID:33506977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Almost 20 000 people undergo an emergency laparotomy each year in New Zealand and Australia. Common indications include small and large bowel obstruction, and intestinal perforation. Considered a high-risk procedure, emergency laparotomy is associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review was to identify and compare 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality rates following emergency laparotomy in New Zealand and Australia.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Electronic searches were performed in Medline, Embase, PubMed and Scopus in April 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. Studies ranged in size from 58 to 75 280 patients. Weighted mean 30-day mortality was 8.40% (8.39-8.41). Mortality rates increased with longer postoperative follow up with 90-day weighted mortality rate of 14.14% (14.13-14.15) and the weighted mortality rate at 1 year of 24.60% (24.56-24.66). There was significant variability in mortality rates between countries.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variability of 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality rates internationally. Lowering postoperative mortality rates following emergency laparotomy through quality improvement initiatives could result in up to 120 lives in New Zealand and over 250 lives in Australia being saved each year. The continued work of the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit - Quality Improvement is crucial to improving emergency laparotomy mortality rates further in New Zealand and Australia.

摘要

背景

在新西兰和澳大利亚,每年有近2万人接受急诊剖腹手术。常见适应症包括小肠和大肠梗阻以及肠穿孔。急诊剖腹手术被认为是一种高风险手术,其发病率和死亡率显著较高。本综述的目的是确定并比较新西兰和澳大利亚急诊剖腹手术后30天、90天和1年的死亡率。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统评价。2020年4月在Medline、Embase、PubMed和Scopus中进行了电子检索。

结果

33篇论文符合纳入标准。研究规模从58例到75280例患者不等。加权平均30天死亡率为8.40%(8.39 - 8.41)。随着术后随访时间延长,死亡率上升,90天加权死亡率为14.14%(14.13 - 14.15),1年加权死亡率为24.60%(24.56 - 24.66)。各国之间的死亡率存在显著差异。

结论

国际上30天、90天和1年的死亡率差异很大。通过质量改进措施降低急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率,每年在新西兰可挽救多达120人的生命,在澳大利亚可挽救超过250人的生命。澳大利亚和新西兰急诊剖腹手术审计 - 质量改进的持续工作对于进一步提高新西兰和澳大利亚的急诊剖腹手术死亡率至关重要。

相似文献

1
New Zealand and Australia emergency laparotomy mortality rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systematic review.新西兰和澳大利亚急诊剖腹手术死亡率与国际结果相比更具优势:一项系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2583-2591. doi: 10.1111/ans.16563. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Two-year outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement pilot study.澳大利亚和新西兰急诊剖腹手术审计-质量改进试点研究的两年期结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2575-2582. doi: 10.1111/ans.17037. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Low mortality rate after emergency laparotomy in Australia is a reflection of its national surgical mortality audit influencing futile surgery.澳大利亚急诊剖腹手术后的低死亡率反映了其全国外科手术死亡率审计对无效手术的影响。
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1367-1373. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad200.
5
Markers of sarcopenia increase 30-day mortality following emergency laparotomy: A systematic review.肌少症标志物增加急诊剖腹术后 30 天死亡率:系统评价。
Scand J Surg. 2023 Mar;112(1):58-65. doi: 10.1177/14574969221133198. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Outcomes following emergency laparotomy in Australian public hospitals.澳大利亚公立医院急诊剖腹手术后的结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):998-1002. doi: 10.1111/ans.14847. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Multidisciplinary survey of current and future use of emergency laparotomy risk assessment scores in New Zealand.新西兰急诊剖腹手术风险评估评分当前及未来应用的多学科调查。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 May;48(3):236-242. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20907102. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Elective abdominal wall hernia repair surgical mortality-A systematic review of the literature and peer review of mortality in Australia.择期腹壁疝修补手术死亡率:文献系统评价和澳大利亚死亡率同行评审。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):1588-1595. doi: 10.1111/ans.16977. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
9
One-Year Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review.急诊剖腹手术后 1 年的结果:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2022 Mar;46(3):512-523. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06385-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
10
Systematic review of disparities in surgical care for Māori in New Zealand.新西兰毛利人外科护理差异的系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;88(7-8):683-689. doi: 10.1111/ans.14310. Epub 2017 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related quality of life after emergency abdominal surgery.急诊腹部手术后的健康相关生活质量。
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Sep 2;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00643-1.
2
Emergency laparotomy risk assessment: An audit of South Australian hospitals.急诊剖腹手术风险评估:南澳大利亚医院的一项审计
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Nov 24;15:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100225. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Impact of routine pre-operative risk assessment on patients undergoing emergency major abdominal surgery in a regional Victorian hospital.
常规术前风险评估对维多利亚州一家地区医院接受急诊重大腹部手术患者的影响。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Dec;94(12):2238-2244. doi: 10.1111/ans.19260. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
4
Revolution in sepsis: a symptoms-based to a systems-based approach?脓毒症的革命:从基于症状的方法到基于系统的方法?
J Biomed Sci. 2024 May 30;31(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12929-024-01043-4.
5
Prognostic significance of preoperative osteosarcopenia on patient' outcomes after emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.术前骨肌减少症对胃肠道穿孔急诊手术后患者结局的预后意义。
Surg Today. 2024 Aug;54(8):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02849-3. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
One-year mortality rates after standardized management for emergency laparotomy: results from the Swedish SMASH study.标准化管理下急诊剖腹手术后 1 年的死亡率:来自瑞典 SMASH 研究的结果。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad133.
7
A Retrospective Cohort Study on One-Year Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Tertiary Centre Experience From Western Australia.急诊剖腹手术后一年死亡率的回顾性队列研究:西澳大利亚一家三级中心的经验
Cureus. 2023 Dec 18;15(12):e50718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50718. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Effect of sarcopenia in predicting postoperative mortality in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肌少症对急诊剖腹术后死亡率预测的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun 25;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00440-0.
9
Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk.使用急诊剖腹手术死亡风险模型突出临床风险预测中的不确定性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jun 8;5(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00616-7.
10
Sarcopenia 'made simple' and outcomes from emergency laparotomy.肌少症“简单化”和急诊剖腹术的结局。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Dec;92(12):3198-3203. doi: 10.1111/ans.17759. Epub 2022 May 16.