• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊腹部手术后的健康相关生活质量。

Health-related quality of life after emergency abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Gordeev Vladimir Sergeevich, Assefa Esubalew, Pearse Rupert, Edwards Mark, Mihaylova Borislava

机构信息

Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Sep 2;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00643-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-025-00643-1
PMID:40898348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12403461/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' survival and quality of life are key factors in assessing value of treatments. However, limited evidence exists about the trajectory and key determinants of patients' health-related quality of life (QoL) following emergency abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Using the Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients study with measured QoL during eight months follow-up using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, we summarise the trajectory of patients' QoL after emergency abdominal surgery and use multivariable regression models to relate patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, pre-surgery characteristics, and time elapsed since surgery with their QoL. In further analysis we assess the contribution of post-surgery patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Data from 686 patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (50.4% female; mean age 66.6 (standard deviation (SD) 12.8) years; 50.1% with intestinal obstruction as indication for surgery), with QoL measurements were analysed. Shortly after surgery (mean days 7.59 (SD 7.48)), the mean EQ-5D-3L QoL utility score was 0.21 (SD 0.46), which improved among survivors to 0.74 (SD 0.31) in the medium- to long-term (i.e., three to eight months) following surgery. Patient's sex and preoperative risk of mortality were key determinants of QoL shortly after surgery. In addition to time since surgery, patient's sex, Charlson Comorbidity index, ASA physical status and indication for surgery were key pre-surgery predictors of QoL in the medium- to long-term post-surgery. From post-surgery characteristics, duration of hospital admission for index surgery and further days in hospital within 30 days prior to QoL measurement were key further determinants of QoL in the medium- to long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual patient, surgery, and recovery characteristics determine QoL post-emergency abdominal surgery and can help inform clinician-patient discussions and assessments of value of abdominal surgery interventions.

摘要

背景

患者的生存和生活质量是评估治疗价值的关键因素。然而,关于急诊腹部手术后患者健康相关生活质量(QoL)的轨迹和关键决定因素的证据有限。

方法

利用针对高危患者的强化围手术期护理研究,在八个月的随访期间使用EQ-5D-3L问卷测量QoL,我们总结了急诊腹部手术后患者QoL的轨迹,并使用多变量回归模型将患者的人口统计学和临床特征、术前特征以及手术以来的时间与他们的QoL联系起来。在进一步分析中,我们评估术后患者特征的作用。

结果

分析了686例接受急诊腹部手术患者的数据(50.4%为女性;平均年龄66.6(标准差(SD)12.8)岁;50.1%以肠梗阻作为手术指征),并进行了QoL测量。术后不久(平均7.59(SD 7.48)天),平均EQ-5D-3L QoL效用评分为0.21(SD 0.46),在幸存者中,术后中长期(即三至八个月)改善至0.74(SD 0.31)。患者的性别和术前死亡风险是术后不久QoL的关键决定因素。除了手术时间外,患者的性别、Charlson合并症指数、ASA身体状况和手术指征是术后中长期QoL的关键术前预测因素。从术后特征来看,首次手术的住院时间和QoL测量前30天内的进一步住院天数是术后中长期QoL的关键进一步决定因素。

结论

个体患者、手术和恢复特征决定了急诊腹部手术后的QoL,并有助于为临床医生与患者的讨论以及腹部手术干预价值的评估提供信息。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life after emergency abdominal surgery.急诊腹部手术后的健康相关生活质量。
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Sep 2;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00643-1.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
A prospective longitudinal cohort study for quality of life in patients undergoing fourth level liver surgery.一项关于接受四级肝脏手术患者生活质量的前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05771-x.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of male bladder outlet obstruction: long-term follow-up of the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.用于男性膀胱出口梗阻诊断和管理的尿动力学检查:UPSTREAM非劣效性随机对照试验的长期随访
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(26):1-57. doi: 10.3310/SLPT4675.
7
Glucocorticosteroids for people with alcoholic hepatitis.用于酒精性肝炎患者的糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD001511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001511.pub3.
8
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
9
Anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing laryngectomy: A long-term prospective evaluation.头颈部癌症行喉切除术患者的焦虑、抑郁和生活质量:一项长期前瞻性评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1865-1877. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13036. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Is Kinesiophobia Associated With Quality of Life, Level of Physical Activity, and Function in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis?恐动症与老年膝骨关节炎患者的生活质量、身体活动水平及功能是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):667-676. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003278. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.急腹症手术后的生活质量:系统评价。
BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02337-y.
2
Reporting of health-related quality of life in emergency laparotomy trials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.报告在急诊剖腹手术试验中与健康相关的生活质量:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03531-w. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Enhanced perioperative care in emergency general surgery: the WSES position paper.加强急诊普通外科围手术期护理:WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct 6;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00519-2.
4
One-Year Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review.急诊剖腹手术后 1 年的结果:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2022 Mar;46(3):512-523. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06385-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia.围手术期和麻醉护理核心结局测量(COMPAC):一个改良的德尔菲法过程,用于开发围手术期护理和麻醉试验的核心结局集。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Mortality following emergency laparotomy: a Swedish cohort study.急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率:一项瑞典队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01319-8.
7
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: Part 1-Preoperative: Diagnosis, Rapid Assessment and Optimization.《围手术期紧急剖腹手术护理指南》增强术后恢复(ERAS)协会推荐:第 1 部分-术前:诊断、快速评估和优化。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1272-1290. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
New Zealand and Australia emergency laparotomy mortality rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systematic review.新西兰和澳大利亚急诊剖腹手术死亡率与国际结果相比更具优势:一项系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2583-2591. doi: 10.1111/ans.16563. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Risk factors for mortality after emergency laparotomy: scoping systematic review.急诊剖腹手术后死亡的风险因素:范围系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Oct;90(10):1895-1902. doi: 10.1111/ans.16082. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
10
Decision-making for older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: defining patient and clinician values and priorities.老年患者急诊剖腹手术的决策:明确患者和临床医生的价值观及优先事项。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1694-1703. doi: 10.1111/codi.15165. Epub 2020 Jun 21.