• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精税变化对零售价格的影响:餐饮业酒类零售商如何将税收变化转嫁给消费者?

The effect of alcohol tax changes on retail prices: how do on-trade alcohol retailers pass through tax changes to consumers?

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Tobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01261-1. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01261-1
PMID:33507448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7954722/
Abstract

The effectiveness of alcohol duty increases relies on alcohol retailers passing the tax increase on to consumers. This study uses sales data from a market research company to investigate tax pass-through over 11 years for on-premise retailers in England and whether this varies across the price distribution, for different beverage categories and outlet types. Panel data quantile regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of 12 excise duty changes and 3 sales tax changes between 2007 and 2017 on prices. We use product-level quarterly panel data from for 777 alcoholic products. We undertake the regression at all outlets level separating products are analysed in seven broad beverage categories (Beer, Cider, RTDs, Spirits, Wine, Sparkling Wine, and Fortified Wine). We further test sensitivity by disaggregating outlets into seven outlet types. For all seven broad beverage categories, we find that there exists significant differences in tax pass-through across the price distribution. Retailers appear to "undershift" cheaper beverages (prices rise by less than the tax increase) and subsidise this loss in revenue with an "overshift" in the relatively more expensive products. Future modelling of tax change impacts on population subgroups could incorporate this evidence, and this is important because different socio-economic and drinker groups purchase alcohol at different points on the price distribution and hence are affected differently by tax changes. Governments could also potentially incorporate this evidence into future impact assessments.

摘要

酒精税的有效性增加依赖于酒类零售商将增加的税收转嫁给消费者。本研究使用市场研究公司的销售数据,调查了英格兰 11 年来酒类零售商的税收转嫁情况,以及这种情况在不同价格分布、不同饮料类别和不同销售渠道类型之间是否存在差异。使用面板数据分位数回归分析来估计 2007 年至 2017 年期间 12 项消费税变化和 3 项销售税变化对价格的影响。我们使用了 777 种酒精产品的季度面板数据,在所有销售渠道水平上进行回归,将产品分为七个广泛的饮料类别(啤酒、苹果酒、预调酒、烈酒、葡萄酒、汽酒和加强葡萄酒)进行分析。我们进一步通过将销售渠道细分为七种类型来测试敏感性。对于所有七个广泛的饮料类别,我们发现税收转嫁在价格分布上存在显著差异。零售商似乎在“低价转移”(价格涨幅低于税收增加),并通过对相对较贵产品的“高价转移”来补贴这种收入损失。未来对人口亚组税收变化影响的建模可以纳入这一证据,这一点很重要,因为不同的社会经济和饮酒群体在价格分布的不同点购买酒精,因此受到税收变化的影响不同。政府也可以将这一证据纳入未来的影响评估中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735f/7954722/7f33f3554ee8/10198_2020_1261_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735f/7954722/69052886cf36/10198_2020_1261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735f/7954722/7f33f3554ee8/10198_2020_1261_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735f/7954722/69052886cf36/10198_2020_1261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735f/7954722/7f33f3554ee8/10198_2020_1261_Fig2a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of alcohol tax changes on retail prices: how do on-trade alcohol retailers pass through tax changes to consumers?酒精税变化对零售价格的影响:餐饮业酒类零售商如何将税收变化转嫁给消费者?
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01261-1. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Alcohol tax pass-through across the product and price range: do retailers treat cheap alcohol differently?酒精税在不同产品和价格区间的转嫁:零售商对低价酒精的处理方式是否不同?
Addiction. 2014 Dec;109(12):1994-2002. doi: 10.1111/add.12590. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
The pass-through of alcohol excise taxes to prices in OECD countries.经合组织国家酒类消费税向价格的传递。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01177-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Relationships between US state alcohol policies and alcohol outcomes: differences by gender and race/ethnicity.美国州酒精政策与酒精相关结果之间的关系:性别和种族/民族差异。
Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1111/add.14937. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
6
Alcohol excise taxes as a percentage of retail alcohol prices in 26 OECD countries.26 个经合组织国家的酒类零售价格中酒精消费税所占的百分比。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 1;219:108415. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108415. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
7
Comparing taxes on alcoholic beverages in the Region of the Americas.比较美洲区域的酒类饮料税收。
Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1389-1395. doi: 10.1111/add.16146. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
8
Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study.不同酒精税和价格政策对健康不平等的估计影响:一项数学建模研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 23;13(2):e1001963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001963. eCollection 2016 Feb.
9
Quantile regression of tobacco tax pass-through in the UK 2017-2021: how have manufacturers passed through tax changes for different tobacco products in small retailers? Analysis at the national level and by neighbourhood of deprivation.英国2017 - 2021年烟草税转嫁的分位数回归:制造商如何将不同烟草产品的税收变化转嫁给小零售商?国家层面及贫困社区分析
Tob Control. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058958.
10
Altering alcohol price by ethanol content: results from a Swedish tax policy in 1992.按乙醇含量调整酒精价格:1992年瑞典税收政策的结果
Addiction. 1997 Jul;92(7):859-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Options for modifying UK alcohol and tobacco tax: A rapid scoping review of the evidence over the period 1997-2018.修改英国烟酒税的方案:对1997年至2018年期间证据的快速范围审查。
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Oct 30;3:26. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13379.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Reducing alcohol use through alcohol control policies in the general population and population subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.通过针对普通人群及人群亚组实施酒精控制政策来减少酒精使用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May 10;59:101996. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101996. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Evaluating the impact of alcohol minimum unit pricing on deaths and hospitalisations in Scotland: a controlled interrupted time series study.
评估苏格兰最低单位酒精定价对死亡和住院人数的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列研究。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00497-X. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol-related hospital outcomes: systematic review.最低单位定价对与酒精相关的医院结局的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e065220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220.