• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最低单位定价对与酒精相关的医院结局的影响:系统评价。

Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol-related hospital outcomes: systematic review.

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Hepatology Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e065220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220
PMID:36737089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9900069/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of minimum unit pricing (MUP) on the primary outcome of alcohol-related hospitalisation, and secondary outcomes of length of stay, hospital mortality and alcohol-related liver disease in hospital.

DESIGN

Databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, APA Psycinfo, CINAHL Plus and Cochrane Reviews were searched from 1 January 2011 to 11 November 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the impact of minimum pricing policies, and we excluded non-minimum pricing policies or studies without alcohol-related hospital outcomes. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess risk of bias, and the Bradford Hill Criteria were used to infer causality for outcome measures.

SETTING

MUP sets a legally required floor price per unit of alcohol and is estimated to reduce alcohol-attributable healthcare burden.

PARTICIPANT

All studies meeting inclusion criteria from any country INTERVENTION: Minimum pricing policy of alcohol PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: RESULTS: 22 studies met inclusion criteria; 6 natural experiments and 16 modelling studies. Countries included Australia, Canada, England, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Scotland, South Africa and Wales. Modelling studies estimated that MUP could reduce alcohol-related admissions by 3%-10% annually and the majority of real-world studies demonstrated that acute alcohol-related admissions responded immediately and reduced by 2%-9%, and chronic alcohol-related admissions lagged by 2-3 years and reduced by 4%-9% annually. Minimum pricing could target the heaviest consumers from the most deprived groups who tend to be at greatest risk of alcohol harms, and in so doing has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Using the Bradford Hill Criteria, we inferred a 'moderate-to-strong' causal link that MUP could reduce alcohol-related hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Natural studies were consistent with minimum pricing modelling studies and showed that this policy could reduce alcohol-related hospitalisation and health inequalities.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021274023.

摘要

目的

确定最低单位定价(MUP)对与酒精相关的住院治疗的主要结果以及住院时间、医院死亡率和酒精性肝病的次要结果的影响。

设计

从 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 11 日,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、APA Psycinfo、CINAHL Plus 和 Cochrane Reviews 数据库。纳入标准为评估最低定价政策影响的研究,我们排除了非最低定价政策或无酒精相关住院结果的研究。使用有效公共卫生实践项目工具评估偏倚风险,并使用布拉德福德希尔标准推断结果测量的因果关系。

设置

MUP 设定了法定的每单位酒精最低价格,据估计可以减轻与酒精相关的医疗保健负担。

参与者

来自任何国家的符合纳入标准的所有研究

干预措施

酒精最低定价政策

主要和次要结果测量

结果:有 22 项研究符合纳入标准;6 项自然实验和 16 项模型研究。包括澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰、北爱尔兰、爱尔兰、苏格兰、南非和威尔士。模型研究估计,MUP 每年可减少 3%-10%的与酒精相关的入院率,而大多数真实世界的研究表明,急性酒精相关入院率立即响应并减少了 2%-9%,慢性酒精相关入院率滞后 2-3 年并每年减少 4%-9%。最低定价可以针对来自最贫困群体的最重消费者,这些消费者往往面临最大的酒精危害风险,因此有可能减少健康不平等。使用布拉德福德希尔标准,我们推断出 MUP 可以减少与酒精相关的住院治疗,这是一个“中度到强”的因果关系。

结论

自然研究与最低定价模型研究一致,表明该政策可以减少与酒精相关的住院治疗和健康不平等。

前瞻性注册编号

CRD42021274023。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a3/9900069/8f5d582c201a/bmjopen-2022-065220f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a3/9900069/8f5d582c201a/bmjopen-2022-065220f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a3/9900069/8f5d582c201a/bmjopen-2022-065220f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol-related hospital outcomes: systematic review.最低单位定价对与酒精相关的医院结局的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e065220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220.
2
Evaluating the impact of minimum unit pricing for alcohol in Scotland: a theory-based synthesis of the evidence.评估苏格兰酒类最低单位定价的影响:基于理论的证据综合分析。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02065-2.
3
Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study.不同酒精税和价格政策对健康不平等的估计影响:一项数学建模研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 23;13(2):e1001963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001963. eCollection 2016 Feb.
4
Evidence for the effectiveness of minimum pricing of alcohol: a systematic review and assessment using the Bradford Hill criteria for causality.酒精最低定价有效性的证据:运用布拉德福德·希尔因果关系标准进行的系统评价与评估
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e013497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013497.
5
6
Modelling the impacts of volumetric and minimum unit pricing for alcohol on social harms in Australia.建模分析澳大利亚酒类按容积和最小单位计价对社会危害的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jul;129:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104502. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Evaluating the impact of minimum unit pricing (MUP) on alcohol sales after 3 years of implementation in Scotland: A controlled interrupted time-series study.评估苏格兰实施最低单位定价 (MUP) 3 年后对酒类销售的影响:一项对照中断时间序列研究。
Addiction. 2024 Aug;119(8):1378-1386. doi: 10.1111/add.16492. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
8
Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol.评估苏格兰实施酒精最低单位定价(MUP)可能的预期和非预期后果:一项自然实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 20;9(6):e028482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028482.
9
The Potential Health Impact of an Alcohol Minimum Unit Price in Québec: An Application of the International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies.魁北克省设定酒精最低单位价格的潜在健康影响:国际酒精危害和政策模型的应用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):631-640.
10
Alcohol-related emergency department presentations and hospital admissions around the time of minimum unit pricing in Ireland.爱尔兰实施最低单位定价前后与酒精相关的急诊科就诊情况及住院情况。
Public Health. 2024 Feb;227:38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
"The alcohol-harm paradox": Understanding socioeconomic inequalities in liver disease.“酒精危害悖论”:理解肝病中的社会经济不平等现象。
JHEP Rep. 2025 Jun 21;7(9):101480. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101480. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The global, regional and national burden of pancreatitis due to alcohol use: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 and projections to 2040.酒精所致胰腺炎的全球、区域和国家负担:《2021年全球疾病负担研究》结果及至2040年的预测
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0327831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327831. eCollection 2025.
3
Regional variations and trends in liver transplantation practices across Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
Government Options to Reduce the Impact of Alcohol on Human Health: Obstacles to Effective Policy Implementation.政府减少酒精对人类健康影响的选择:有效政策实施的障碍。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 19;13(8):2846. doi: 10.3390/nu13082846.
2
Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol in South Africa across different drinker groups and wealth quintiles: a modelling study.南非针对不同饮酒群体和财富五分位数实施的酒精最低单位定价的效果:一项建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e052879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052879.
3
Changes in Hospital Discharges with Alcohol-Related Liver Disease in a Gastroenterology and General Medical Unit Following the Introduction of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol: The GRI Q4 Study.
欧洲肝脏移植实践的地区差异与趋势
JHEP Rep. 2025 Apr 11;7(8):101424. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101424. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Public health policies to prevent alcohol-related liver disease.预防酒精性肝病的公共卫生政策。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01084-6.
5
An evaluation of the impact of a national Minimum Unit Price on alcohol policy on alcohol behaviours.一项关于国家酒精最低单位价格政策对饮酒行为影响的评估。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 Feb 28;47(1):e94-e105. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae288.
6
The alcohol harm paradox: is it valid for self-reported alcohol harms and does hazardous drinking pattern matter?酒精危害悖论:它是否适用于自我报告的酒精危害,以及危险的饮酒模式是否重要?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):3053. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20530-9.
7
Adjusting the 15-method to Danish general practice: identification of barriers, facilitators, and user needs.调整 15 法以适应丹麦全科医疗:识别障碍、促进因素和用户需求。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02508-z.
8
The identification and treatment of alcohol problems in primary care (iTAPP) study: protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized control trial testing the 15-method in a primary care setting.初级保健中酒精问题的识别和治疗(iTAPP)研究:在初级保健环境中测试 15 种方法的阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验方案。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 13;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00474-6.
9
Estimating the Effects of Hypothetical Alcohol Minimum Unit Pricing Policies on Alcohol Use and Deaths: A State Example.估算假设的酒精最低单位定价政策对酒精使用和死亡的影响:一个州的例子。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jan;85(1):120-132. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00274.
10
Can alcohol policy prevent harms to women and children from men's alcohol consumption? An overview of existing literature and suggested ways forward.酒精政策能否防止男性饮酒对妇女和儿童造成的伤害?现有文献概述及未来建议。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Sep;119:104148. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104148. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
酒精相关肝病患者在医院出院情况的变化:引入酒精最低单位定价政策后,在胃肠病学和普通医学病房的研究(GRI Q4 研究)
Alcohol Alcohol. 2022 Jul 9;57(4):477-482. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agab051.
4
Waiting for the wave: Political leadership, policy windows, and alcohol policy change in Ireland.等待浪潮:政治领导力、政策窗口与爱尔兰的酒精政策变革。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114116. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114116. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Hazardous and harmful alcohol use in the Northern Territory, Australia: the impact of alcohol policy on critical care admissions using an extended sampling period.澳大利亚北领地的危险和有害酒精使用:使用扩展采样期评估酒精政策对重症监护入院的影响。
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2653-2662. doi: 10.1111/add.15432. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Alcohol policy and gender: a modelling study estimating gender-specific effects of alcohol pricing policies.酒精政策与性别:一项建模研究,旨在估计酒精定价政策对性别特定的影响。
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2372-2384. doi: 10.1111/add.15464. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
7
The effect of alcohol policy on intensive care unit admission patterns in Central Australia: A before-after cross-sectional study.澳大利亚中部地区酒精政策对重症监护病房入院模式的影响:一项前后对照的横断面研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021 Jan;49(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20977503. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
The effect of alcohol tax changes on retail prices: how do on-trade alcohol retailers pass through tax changes to consumers?酒精税变化对零售价格的影响:餐饮业酒类零售商如何将税收变化转嫁给消费者?
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01261-1. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Alcohol control policies in Former Soviet Union countries: A narrative review of three decades of policy changes and their apparent effects.前苏联国家的酒精控制政策:对三十年来政策变化及其明显效果的叙述性回顾。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):350-367. doi: 10.1111/dar.13204. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
The Potential Health Impact of an Alcohol Minimum Unit Price in Québec: An Application of the International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies.魁北克省设定酒精最低单位价格的潜在健康影响:国际酒精危害和政策模型的应用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):631-640.