Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institutes, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(15):18407-18420. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12361-7. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Eating fish is often recommended as part of a healthful diet. However, fish, particularly large predatory fish, can contain significant levels of the highly toxic methylmercury (MeHg). Ocean fish in general also contain high levels of selenium (Se), which is reported to confer protection against toxicity of various metals including mercury (Hg). Se and Hg have a high mutual binding affinity, and each can reduce the toxicity of the other. This is an evolving area of extensive research and controversy with variable results in the animal and epidemiologic literature. MeHg is toxic to many organ systems through high affinity for -SH (thiol) ligands on enzymes and microtubules. Hg toxicity also causes oxidative damage particularly to neurons in the brain. Hg is a potent and apparently irreversible inhibitor of the selenoenzymes, glutathione peroxidases (GPX), and thioredoxin reductases (TXNRD) that are important antioxidants, each with a selenocysteine (SeCys) at the active site. Hg binding to the SeCys inhibits these enzymes, accounting in part for the oxidative damage that is an important manifestation of Hg toxicity, particularly if there is not a pool of excess Se to synthesize new enzymes. A molar excess of Se reflected in an Se:Hg molar ratio > 1 is often invoked as evidence that the Hg content can be discounted. Some recent papers now suggest that if the Se:Hg molar ratio exceeds 1:1, the fish is safe and the mercury concentration can be ignored. Such papers suggested that the molar ratio rather than the Hg concentration should be emphasized in fish advisories. This paper examines some of the limitations of current understanding of the Se:Hg molar ratio in guiding fish consumption advice; Se is certainly an important part of the Hg toxicity story, but it is not the whole story. We examine how Hg toxicity relates also to thiol binding. We suggest that a 1:1 molar ratio cannot be relied on because not all of the Se in fish or in the fish eater is available to interact with Hg. Moreover, in some fish, Se levels are sufficiently high to warrant concern about Se toxicity.
吃鱼通常被推荐为健康饮食的一部分。然而,鱼类,特别是大型掠食性鱼类,可能含有高浓度的剧毒甲基汞(MeHg)。一般来说,海洋鱼类也含有高水平的硒(Se),据报道,硒能提供对各种金属(包括汞(Hg))毒性的保护。Se 和 Hg 具有很高的相互结合亲和力,彼此都可以降低对方的毒性。这是一个广泛研究和争议的领域,动物和流行病学文献中的结果各不相同。MeHg 通过与酶和微管上的 -SH(硫醇)配体的高亲和力对许多器官系统有毒性。Hg 毒性还会导致氧化损伤,特别是大脑中的神经元。Hg 是一种有效的、显然是不可逆的硒酶抑制剂,包括谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPX)和硫氧还蛋白还原酶(TXNRD),它们都是重要的抗氧化剂,每个酶的活性部位都有一个硒代半胱氨酸(SeCys)。Hg 与 SeCys 的结合抑制这些酶,这部分解释了 Hg 毒性的氧化损伤,特别是如果没有多余的 Se 池来合成新的酶。通常情况下,当硒与汞的摩尔比(Se:Hg)大于 1 时,就认为存在硒过量,此时可以忽略汞的含量。一些最新的论文现在表明,如果 Se:Hg 的摩尔比大于 1:1,那么鱼是安全的,可以忽略汞的浓度。这些论文认为,在鱼类建议中,应该强调摩尔比而不是汞浓度。本文探讨了当前对硒与汞摩尔比在指导鱼类消费建议方面的理解的一些局限性;硒当然是汞毒性故事的重要组成部分,但并不是全部。我们还探讨了汞毒性与硫醇结合的关系。我们认为,不能仅仅依靠 1:1 的摩尔比,因为鱼或吃鱼的人所摄入的硒并非全部都能与 Hg 相互作用。此外,在某些鱼类中,硒含量足够高,需要引起对硒毒性的关注。