Department of Social Psychology.
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Nov;106(11):1673-1694. doi: 10.1037/apl0000868. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Risk-taking can fuel innovation and growth, but it can also have devastating consequences for individuals and organizations. Here we examine whether risk-taking affords social-hierarchical benefits to risk-takers. Specifically, we investigate how risk-taking influences perceived dominance, prestige, and the willingness to endorse risk-takers' leadership. Integrating insights from costly signaling theory and the dominance/prestige framework of social rank, we theorized that risk-taking increases leadership endorsement to the degree that it fuels perceptions of prestige, but decreases leadership endorsement to the degree that it fuels perceptions of dominance. However, we also hypothesized that risk-induced perceptions of dominance do translate into leadership endorsement in competitive (rather than cooperative) intergroup settings. We tested these hypotheses in four studies involving different samples, methods, and operationalizations. In Study 1, participants performed an implicit association test (IAT) that revealed that people associate risk with leader positions, and safety with follower positions. Study 2 was a longitudinal field survey conducted during the September 2019 Israeli elections, which showed that voters' perceptions of politicians' risk-taking propensities prior to the elections positively predicted perceived dominance and prestige as well as voting behavior during the elections. Finally, Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated that people are willing to support risk-takers as leaders in the context of competitive (as opposed to cooperative) intergroup situations, because perceived dominance positively predicts leadership endorsement in competitive (but not cooperative) intergroup settings. We discuss implications for understanding the social dynamics of organizational rank and the perpetuation of risky behavior in organizations, politics, and society at large. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
冒险可以为个人和组织带来创新和成长,但也可能带来毁灭性的后果。在这里,我们研究冒险是否为冒险者提供了社会等级优势。具体来说,我们调查了冒险如何影响感知的支配地位、威望以及对冒险者领导能力的认可意愿。我们整合了昂贵信号理论和社会等级地位的支配/威望框架的见解,认为冒险会增加领导认可,只要它能激发人们对威望的看法,但会降低领导认可,只要它能激发人们对支配地位的看法。然而,我们还假设,风险引起的支配感确实会在竞争(而不是合作)的群体间环境中转化为领导认可。我们在四项涉及不同样本、方法和操作化的研究中检验了这些假设。在研究 1 中,参与者进行了内隐联想测试(IAT),该测试表明人们将风险与领导职位联系起来,将安全与追随者职位联系起来。研究 2 是在 2019 年 9 月以色列选举期间进行的一项纵向实地调查,结果表明,选民在选举前对政治家冒险倾向的看法积极预测了选举期间的感知支配地位和威望以及投票行为。最后,研究 3 和 4 表明,在竞争(而不是合作)的群体间情境中,人们愿意支持冒险者担任领导,因为感知的支配地位积极预测了竞争(但不是合作)的群体间情境中的领导认可。我们讨论了这些研究结果对理解组织等级的社会动态以及在组织、政治和整个社会中风险行为的延续的意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。