Department of Communication Studies.
Clinical Child Psychology Program.
Psychol Assess. 2021 Mar;33(3):230-242. doi: 10.1037/pas0000979. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Digital stress is believed to play a role in the association between social media use and psychosocial outcomes. However, the literature is limited by a lack of measures that conform to published theoretical models of the construct. The present investigation details the development of a new multidimensional measure of digital stress. Based on an earlier conceptualization of Digital Stress (Steele et al., 2020), Study 1 identified items from extant measures of digital stress, conducted a qualitative review of the literature to compose new items, and conducted focus groups with young adults and adolescents (N = 23) to improve item wording and interpretation. Study 2 conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of items with a young adult sample (N = 247) collected online, yielding support for four hypothesized factors (i.e., availability stress, approval anxiety, fear of missing out [FoMO], and connection overload) plus one unanticipated factor (i.e., online vigilance). In Study 3, college students (N = 174) completed paper-and-pencil surveys, and EFA results showed a similar structure as detected in Study 2. In Study 4, confirmatory factor analysis examining the five-factor model was conducted on data from adolescents (N = 163) and college students (N = 152). These procedures yielded 24 items measuring 5 components of digital stress: availability stress, approval anxiety, FoMO, connection overload, and online vigilance. Associations between digital stress and psychosocial distress and functioning are reported to demonstrate convergent and divergent validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
数字压力被认为在社交媒体使用与心理社会结果之间的关联中起着作用。然而,由于缺乏符合已发表的结构理论模型的测量方法,文献受到限制。本研究详细介绍了一种新的多维数字压力测量方法的开发。基于早期的数字压力概念化(Steele 等人,2020),研究 1 从现有的数字压力测量中确定了项目,对文献进行了定性审查以组成新的项目,并对年轻人和青少年进行了焦点小组讨论(N = 23),以改善项目的措辞和解释。研究 2 对年轻人样本(N = 247)在线收集的项目进行了探索性因素分析(EFA),结果支持四个假设因素(即可用性压力、认可焦虑、害怕错过[FoMO]和连接过载)以及一个意外因素(即在线警惕性)。在研究 3 中,大学生(N = 174)完成了纸笔问卷调查,EFA 结果显示出与研究 2 中检测到的相似结构。在研究 4 中,对青少年(N = 163)和大学生(N = 152)的数据进行了五因素模型的验证性因素分析。这些程序产生了 24 个项目,用于测量数字压力的 5 个组成部分:可用性压力、认可焦虑、FoMO、连接过载和在线警惕性。报告了数字压力与心理社会困扰和功能之间的关联,以证明其具有收敛和发散的有效性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。