Suppr超能文献

从复杂系统视角评估公共卫生干预措施:研究方法综述。

Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113697. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113697. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Applying a complex systems perspective to public health evaluation may increase the relevance and strength of evidence to improve health and reduce health inequalities. In this review of methods, we aimed to: (i) classify and describe different complex systems methods in evaluation applied to public health; and (ii) examine the kinds of evaluative evidence generated by these different methods.

METHODS

We adapted critical review methods to identify evaluations of public health interventions that used systems methods. We conducted expert consultation, searched electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science), and followed citations of relevant systematic reviews. Evaluations were included if they self-identified as using systems- or complexity-informed methods and if they evaluated existing or hypothetical public health interventions. Case studies were selected to illustrate different types of complex systems evaluation.

FINDINGS

Seventy-four unique studies met our inclusion criteria. A framework was developed to map the included studies onto different stages of the evaluation process, which parallels the planning, delivery, assessment, and further delivery phases of the interventions they seek to inform; these stages include: 1) theorising; 2) prediction (simulation); 3) process evaluation; 4) impact evaluation; and 5) further prediction (simulation). Within this framework, we broadly categorised methodological approaches as mapping, modelling, network analysis and 'system framing' (the application of a complex systems perspective to a range of study designs). Studies frequently applied more than one type of systems method.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of complex systems methods can be utilised, adapted, or combined to produce different types of evaluative evidence. Further methodological innovation in systems evaluation may generate stronger evidence to improve health and reduce health inequalities in our complex world.

摘要

简介

将复杂系统视角应用于公共卫生评估可能会提高证据的相关性和强度,从而改善健康状况并减少健康不平等。在本次方法综述中,我们旨在:(i)对应用于公共卫生评估的不同复杂系统方法进行分类和描述;(ii)研究这些不同方法产生的评价性证据的种类。

方法

我们采用了批判性综述方法来识别使用系统方法的公共卫生干预评估。我们进行了专家咨询,检索了电子数据库(Scopus、MEDLINE、Web of Science),并追踪了相关系统综述的参考文献。只有那些自我认定使用系统或复杂性启发方法并评估现有或假设性公共卫生干预措施的评估才被纳入。案例研究被选中来说明不同类型的复杂系统评价。

结果

74 项独特的研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们开发了一个框架,将纳入的研究映射到评估过程的不同阶段,这与它们试图提供信息的干预措施的规划、交付、评估和进一步交付阶段相平行;这些阶段包括:1)理论化;2)预测(模拟);3)过程评估;4)影响评估;5)进一步预测(模拟)。在这个框架内,我们将方法学方法大致分为映射、建模、网络分析和“系统框架”(将复杂系统视角应用于一系列研究设计)。研究通常会应用不止一种系统方法。

结论

多种复杂系统方法可以被利用、改编或组合,以产生不同类型的评价性证据。在系统评价方面进一步的方法创新可能会为改善我们这个复杂世界的健康状况和减少健康不平等提供更强有力的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验