Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia; and Present address: Northern Health, Epping, Vic. 3076, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:
Western Health, Footscray, Vic. 3054, Australia. Email:
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):7-11. doi: 10.1071/AH20248.
Objective Identify the views of healthcare leaders towards public healthcare's carbon footprint; the importance or not of healthcare energy supply and sources and; the perceived key barriers for Victorian health care to show leadership on renewable energy sources and supply. Methods Self-administered questionnaire (10 Likert scale, two open-ended questions) among 24 Victorian Health Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Responses were anonymous. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results Overall, 13/24 (54%) of CEOs responded. A majority (11/13) agreed that climate change is causing real and accelerating harm to health and the environment, with impacts on patients, staff and services a current issue. One hundred percent (13/13) saw leadership by the public healthcare sector on environmental sustainability as an important responsibility (strongly agreed, 9/13 (69%); agreed, 4/13 (31%)), with most CEOs supporting their institution increasing the amount of renewable electricity supply over-and-above grid levels (strongly agreed, 3/13 (23%); agreed, 9/13 (69%)). However, support for renewable electricity was, for the most part, aspirational and not perceived as a current priority. The key perceived barriers to increasing renewable electricity supply were Health Purchasing Victoria contract and financial constraints. Conclusions Health care itself has a carbon footprint. Public healthcare CEOs are supportive of their institutions increasing use of renewable electricity supply, yet perceived barriers regarding inflexible and poorly transparent purchasing contracts and financial cost exist. What is known about the topic? Australian health care contributes ~7 percent to Australia's total carbon emissions, with hospital energy consumption (coal-generated electricity and natural/fossil gas) a large majority. An executive level champion is a consistent factor across health services that are taking the lead on environmental sustainability. What does this paper add? Our research is original in understanding the views of Victorian public healthcare CEOs on climate change, renewable energy supply and key barriers to increasing uptake. A majority of public healthcare CEOs see energy choices as an important issue for their patients, staff and institution, and that greater leadership should be shown by health care in light of the urgency required to address greenhouse gas emissions. However, support for renewable electricity was, for the most part, aspirational, with specific barriers identified across the healthcare network. What are the implications for practitioners? This research provides information that can inform a pathway to healthcare decarbonisation via sector-wide action.
确定医疗保健领域领导者对公共医疗保健碳足迹的看法;医疗保健能源供应和来源的重要性;以及维多利亚州医疗保健机构在可再生能源供应方面发挥领导作用的主要障碍。
对 24 名维多利亚州卫生首席执行官(CEOs)进行了自我管理的问卷(10 分李克特量表,两个开放式问题)。回应是匿名的。进行了描述性分析。
总体而言,24 名 CEO 中有 13 名(54%)做出了回应。大多数(11/13)同意气候变化正在对健康和环境造成真正且加速的伤害,对患者、员工和服务的影响是当前的一个问题。100%(13/13)认为公共医疗保健部门在环境可持续性方面的领导作用是一项重要责任(强烈同意,9/13(69%);同意,4/13(31%)),大多数 CEO 支持他们的机构增加可再生电力供应超过电网水平(强烈同意,3/13(23%);同意,9/13(69%))。然而,对可再生电力的支持在很大程度上是理想的,而不是当前的优先事项。增加可再生电力供应的主要感知障碍是维多利亚州医疗采购合同和财务限制。
医疗保健本身就有碳足迹。公共医疗保健 CEO 支持他们的机构增加可再生电力供应,但对于僵化和透明度差的采购合同以及财务成本存在感知障碍。
关于这个主题已知的是什么?澳大利亚的医疗保健贡献了澳大利亚总碳排放量的~7%,医院能源消耗(煤炭产生的电力和天然气/化石燃料)占绝大多数。在环境可持续性方面处于领先地位的卫生服务机构中,都有一个行政级别的拥护者。
这篇论文增加了什么?我们的研究是原始的,它了解了维多利亚州公共医疗保健 CEO 对气候变化、可再生能源供应以及增加采用的主要障碍的看法。大多数公共医疗保健 CEO 认为能源选择对他们的患者、员工和机构来说是一个重要问题,鉴于解决温室气体排放所需要的紧迫性,医疗保健应该发挥更大的领导作用。然而,对可再生电力的支持在很大程度上是理想的,在医疗保健网络中确定了具体的障碍。
从业者的意义是什么?这项研究提供了信息,可以通过全行业行动为医疗保健脱碳提供途径。