• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

假体-患者不匹配是经导管主动脉瓣置换术后充血性心力衰竭的独立预测因子。

Prosthesis-patient mismatch is an independent predictor of congestive heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France.

Department of Cardiology, La Timone Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France.

出版信息

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun-Jul;114(6-7):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2020.11.005
PMID:33509746
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We reported previously an increased risk of PPM with the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (S3-THV).

AIMS

To investigate the association of PPM with 1-year outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) implanted with S3-THV.

METHODS

Moderate PPM was defined by an indexed effective orifice area (iEOA)≤0.85cm/m, and severe PPM by an iEOA<0.65cm/m. Inclusion criteria were severe symptomatic AS and implantation with S3-THV. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) at 1 year; the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 208 consecutive patients were included between 2016 and 2018. Male sex was prevalent (53.8%), mean age was 81.9±6.2 years, mean EuroSCORE II was 4.35±3.37, mean LVEF was 57.9±13%. Moderate and severe PPM were observed in 69 (33.2%) and 10 (4.8%) patients. Patients with PPM were younger (80.4±7 vs 82.8±5.41 years; P=0.006), had a larger BSA (1.84±0.19 vs 1.77±0.19 m; P=0.01), a lower iEOA (0.73±0.08 vs 1.11±0.22 cm/m; P<0.001) and a higher mean gradient (14±4.6 vs 11.9±3.9mmHg; P<0.001). CHF occurred in 16.5% vs 7% (P=0.03). By multivariable analysis, PPM was independently associated with CHF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 8.55; P=0.032), especially in patients with mitral regurgitation≥2/4 (HR>100, 95%CI>100 to>1000; P<0.01). PPM did not correlate with all-cause mortality (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.22 to 3.03; P=0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

PPM after S3-THV implantation is strongly associated with CHF at 1 year, but is not correlated with overall mortality.

摘要

背景

关于假体-患者不匹配(PPM)对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结果的影响知之甚少。我们之前报道过,使用 SAPIEN 3 经导管心脏瓣膜(S3-THV)会增加 PPM 的风险。

目的

研究 S3-THV 植入的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的 PPM 与 1 年结局的关系。

方法

中度 PPM 的定义为指数有效瓣口面积(iEOA)≤0.85cm/m,重度 PPM 的定义为 iEOA<0.65cm/m。纳入标准为严重有症状的 AS 并植入 S3-THV。主要终点为 1 年内因充血性心力衰竭(CHF)住院;次要终点为全因死亡率。

结果

2016 年至 2018 年期间共纳入 208 例连续患者。男性居多(53.8%),平均年龄 81.9±6.2 岁,平均 EuroSCORE II 为 4.35±3.37,平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为 57.9±13%。69 例(33.2%)和 10 例(4.8%)患者出现中度和重度 PPM。PPM 患者年龄较小(80.4±7 岁 vs 82.8±5.41 岁;P=0.006),BSA 较大(1.84±0.19 vs 1.77±0.19 m;P=0.01),iEOA 较小(0.73±0.08 vs 1.11±0.22 cm/m;P<0.001),平均梯度较高(14±4.6 vs 11.9±3.9mmHg;P<0.001)。CHF 发生率为 16.5% vs 7%(P=0.03)。多变量分析显示,PPM 与 CHF 独立相关(风险比 [HR] 3.17,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.17 至 8.55;P=0.032),尤其是在二尖瓣反流≥2/4(HR>100,95%CI>100 至>1000;P<0.01)的患者中。PPM 与全因死亡率无关(HR 0.90,95%CI 0.22 至 3.03;P=0.86)。

结论

S3-THV 植入后 PPM 与 1 年时的 CHF 密切相关,但与总体死亡率无关。

相似文献

1
Prosthesis-patient mismatch is an independent predictor of congestive heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.假体-患者不匹配是经导管主动脉瓣置换术后充血性心力衰竭的独立预测因子。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun-Jul;114(6-7):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Incidence and predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after TAVI using SAPIEN 3 in Asian: differences between the newer and older balloon-expandable valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)使用 SAPIEN 3 后亚洲人种假体-患者不匹配的发生率和预测因素:新型和旧型球囊扩张瓣膜之间的差异。
Open Heart. 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001531.
3
Impact of Pre-Existing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival Following Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures.人工生物瓣-患者不匹配对主动脉瓣瓣中瓣手术患者生存的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.039.
4
Predictors and 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of Pacemaker After TAVR: Analysis From the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 Registries.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后起搏器的预测因素和 5 年临床结局:来自 PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 注册研究的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun 10;17(11):1325-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.034.
5
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prevalence and medium term prognostic impact.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配:患病率及中期预后影响
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May;35(5):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-01519-z. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
6
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation is more successful with the Edwards Sapien 3 compared with the Edwards XT for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.经股主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄时,爱德华兹·萨皮恩 3 号瓣比爱德华兹 XT 瓣更成功。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Aug-Sep;111(8-9):470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients: The OCEAN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后亚洲患者假体-患者不匹配的发生率、预测因素和临床影响:OCEAN-TAVI 注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):771-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.273.
8
Bioprosthetic Valve Performance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Large Versus Small Aortic Valve Annuli: Insights From the CHOICE Trial and the CHOICE-Extend Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后生物瓣性能:自膨式瓣膜与球囊扩张式瓣膜在大瓣环与小瓣环中的比较:来自 CHOICE 试验和 CHOICE-Extend 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2507-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.050. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
9
CT-Defined Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Downgrades Frequency and Severity, and Demonstrates No Association With Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.CT 定义的假体-患者不匹配降级频率和严重程度,并且在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后与不良结局无关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1578-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Impact of prosthesis-iteration evolution and sizing practice on the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后假体迭代演变和尺寸选择实践对假体-患者不匹配发生率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):971-979. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27977. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
CT-based evaluation of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and its influence on outcome.基于CT对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者-人工瓣膜不匹配的评估及其对预后的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02701-9.
2
Determinants of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement-Ten-Year Cohort Data in Single Center of Taiwan.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的决定因素——台湾单中心十年队列数据
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2024 Sep;40(5):595-607. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240207B.
3
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on 1-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-analysis of 71,106 Patients.
人工瓣膜-患者不匹配对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后1年结局的影响:对71106例患者的荟萃分析
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):318-326. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0073.