Vavala Tiziana, Malapelle Umberto, Veggiani Claudia, Ludovini Vienna, Papotti Mauro, Leone Alvaro, Graziano Paolo, Minari Roberta, Bono Francesca, Sapino Anna, Manotti Laura, Troncone Giancarlo, Pisapia Pasquale, Girlando Salvatore, Buffoni Lucio, Righi Luisella, Colantonio Ida, Bertetto Oscar, Novello Silvia
SC Oncology, ASL CN1, Saluzzo, Italy
Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
J Clin Pathol. 2022 Apr;75(4):234-240. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207339. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Heterogeneous implementation of molecular tests in current diagnostic algorithm at a European and international level is emerging as a major issue for efficient lung cancer molecular profiling.
From May 2017 until October 2017, N=1612 patients referring to 13 Italian institutions were selected, at advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and prospectively evaluated. Principal endpoints were: the percentage of diagnoses performed on cytological and histological material, the proportion of requests for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational status, and resistance mutations detected on tissue and/or liquid biopsy samples after first-generation or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the proportion of requests for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) and Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) determinations, the proportion of requests for programmed death-ligand1 (PD-L1) evaluation and, finally, the different assays used for the detection of EGFR mutations, ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements and PD-L1 expression.
Of 1325 patients finally included, only 50.8% requests were related to driver mutations with target agents already available in first-line at that preplanned time, while 49.2% were associated with PD-L1, ROS1, KRAS and others. Multiplex genomic assays (such as next-generation sequencing) were considered by all participating centres.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in a 'real-life daily practice' involving both pathologists and oncologists evaluating routinely workflow and trends towards improvements in molecular requests. Collected data aim to describe the applied algorithms and evolution of molecular screening for stage IV NSCLC in clinical practice.
在欧洲和国际层面,当前诊断算法中分子检测的异质性实施正成为高效肺癌分子谱分析的一个主要问题。
从2017年5月至2017年10月,选取了转诊至意大利13家机构的N = 1612例晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,并进行前瞻性评估。主要终点包括:基于细胞学和组织学材料进行诊断的百分比、对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态的检测请求比例、在第一代或第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后在组织和/或液体活检样本中检测到的耐药突变比例、对间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)基因重排、ROS原癌基因1(ROS1)和 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤(KRAS)检测的请求比例、对程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)评估的请求比例,以及最后用于检测EGFR突变、ALK和ROS1基因重排及PD-L1表达的不同检测方法。
在最终纳入的1325例患者中,在那个预先计划的时间,只有50.8%的检测请求与一线已有靶向药物的驱动基因突变相关,而49.2%与PD-L1、ROS1、KRAS及其他相关。所有参与中心都考虑了多重基因组检测(如下一代测序)。
据我们所知,这是第一项在“现实生活日常实践”中涉及病理学家和肿瘤学家评估常规工作流程及分子检测请求改进趋势的研究。收集的数据旨在描述临床实践中IV期NSCLC分子筛查所应用的算法及演变情况。