Darwin Zoe, Domoney Jill, Iles Jane, Bristow Florence, Siew Jasmine, Sethna Vaheshta
School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Section of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 12;11:585479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585479. eCollection 2020.
Five to 10 percentage of fathers experience perinatal depression and 5-15% experience perinatal anxiety, with rates increasing when mothers are also experiencing perinatal mental health disorders. Perinatal mental illness in either parent contributes to adverse child and family outcomes. While there are increasing calls to assess the mental health of both parents, universal services (e.g., maternity) and specialist perinatal mental health services usually focus on the mother (i.e., the gestational parent). The aim of this review was to identify and synthesize evidence on the performance of mental health screening tools and the acceptability of mental health assessment, specifically in relation to fathers, other co-parents and partners in the perinatal period. A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Maternity, and Infant Care Database and CINAHL). Articles were eligible if they included expectant or new partners, regardless of the partner's gender or relationship status. Accuracy was determined by comparison of screening tool with diagnostic interview. Acceptability was predominantly assessed through parents' and health professionals' perspectives. Narrative synthesis was applied to all elements of the review, with thematic analysis applied to the acceptability studies. Seven accuracy studies and 20 acceptability studies were included. The review identified that existing evidence focuses on resident fathers and assessing depression in universal settings. All accuracy studies assessed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale but with highly varied results. Evidence on acceptability in practice is limited to postnatal settings. Amongst both fathers and health professionals, views on assessment are mixed. Identified challenges were categorized at the individual-, practitioner- and service-level. These include: gendered perspectives on mental health; the potential to compromise support offered to mothers; practitioners' knowledge, skills, and confidence; service culture and remit; time pressures; opportunity for contact; and the need for tools, training, supervision and onward referral routes. There is a paucity of published evidence on assessing the mental health of fathers, co-mothers, step-parents and other partners in the perinatal period. Whilst practitioners need to be responsive to mental health needs, further research is needed with stakeholders in a range of practice settings, with attention to ethical and practical considerations, to inform the implementation of evidence-based assessment.
5%至10%的父亲会经历围产期抑郁症,5%至15%的父亲会经历围产期焦虑,当母亲也患有围产期精神健康障碍时,这些比例会上升。父母任何一方患有围产期精神疾病都会导致不良的儿童和家庭后果。虽然越来越多的人呼吁评估父母双方的心理健康,但普遍服务(如产妇服务)和围产期精神健康专科服务通常只关注母亲(即妊娠方)。本综述的目的是识别和综合关于心理健康筛查工具的性能以及心理健康评估的可接受性的证据,特别是关于围产期父亲、其他共同父母和伴侣的相关证据。使用电子数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、产妇和婴儿护理数据库以及CINAHL)进行了系统检索。如果文章包括准伴侣或新伴侣,无论其性别或关系状况如何,均符合入选标准。通过将筛查工具与诊断访谈进行比较来确定准确性。可接受性主要通过父母和卫生专业人员的观点进行评估。对综述的所有要素进行叙述性综合,并对可接受性研究进行主题分析。纳入了7项准确性研究和20项可接受性研究。综述发现现有证据主要集中在常住父亲以及在普遍环境中评估抑郁症。所有准确性研究都评估了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表,但结果差异很大。实践中关于可接受性的证据仅限于产后环境。在父亲和卫生专业人员中,对评估的看法不一。确定的挑战分为个人、从业者和服务层面。这些挑战包括:对心理健康的性别化看法;可能会损害为母亲提供的支持;从业者的知识、技能和信心;服务文化和职责范围;时间压力;接触机会;以及对工具、培训监督和转诊途径的需求。关于围产期评估父亲、共同母亲、继父母和其他伴侣心理健康的已发表证据很少。虽然从业者需要对心理健康需求做出反应,但需要在一系列实践环境中与利益相关者进行进一步研究,同时关注伦理和实际考虑因素,以为基于证据的评估的实施提供信息。