Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Geroscience. 2021 Apr;43(2):655-672. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00319-5. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Evidence of an association between psychosocial stress and mortality continues to accumulate. However, despite repeated calls in the literature for further examination into the physiological and behavioral pathways though which stress affects health and mortality, research on this topic remains limited. This study addresses this gap by employing a counterfactual-based mediation analysis of eight behavioral, biological, and psychological pathways often hypothesized to play a role in the association between stress and health. First, we calculated the survival rate of all-cause mortality associated with cumulative psychosocial stress (high vs. low/moderate) using random effects accelerated failure time models among a sample of 7108 adults from the Midlife in the United States panel study. Then, we conducted a multiple mediator mediation analysis utilizing a counterfactual regression framework to determine the relative contributions of each mediator and all mediators combined in the association between stress and mortality. Exposure to high psychosocial stress was associated with a 0.76 times reduced survival rate over the follow-up period 1995-2015, while adjusting for age, sex, race, income, education, baseline health, and study design effects. The mediators accounted for 49% of this association. In particular, smoking, sedentary behavior, obesity/BMI, and cardiovascular disease displayed significant indirect effects and accounted for the largest reductions in the total effect of stress on mortality, with natural indirect effects of 14%, 12%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. In conclusion, traditional behavioral and biological risk factors play a significant role in the association between psychosocial stress and mortality among middle and older adults in the US context. While eliminating stress and the socioeconomic disparities that so often deliver people into high-stress scenarios should be the ultimate goal, public health interventions addressing smoking cessation, physical activity promotion, and cardiovascular disease treatment may pay dividends for preventing premature mortality in the near-term.
心理社会压力与死亡率之间存在关联的证据不断积累。然而,尽管文献中多次呼吁进一步研究压力影响健康和死亡率的生理和行为途径,但关于这一主题的研究仍然有限。本研究通过对经常被假设在压力与健康之间关联中起作用的八种行为、生物和心理途径进行基于反事实的中介分析,来填补这一空白。首先,我们使用随机效应加速失效时间模型,在 7108 名来自美国中年人群研究小组的成年人样本中,计算与累积心理社会压力(高与低/中度)相关的全因死亡率的生存率。然后,我们利用反事实回归框架进行多中介中介分析,以确定每个中介和所有中介在压力与死亡率之间关联中的相对贡献。在调整年龄、性别、种族、收入、教育、基线健康和研究设计效果后,暴露于高心理社会压力与随访期间(1995-2015 年)生存率降低 0.76 倍相关。这些中介因素解释了这种关联的 49%。特别是,吸烟、久坐行为、肥胖/BMI 和心血管疾病显示出显著的间接影响,分别占压力对死亡率总效应减少的 14%、12%、11%和 4%。总之,传统的行为和生物危险因素在美国中年和老年人的心理社会压力与死亡率之间的关联中起着重要作用。虽然消除压力和经常导致人们处于高压力环境的社会经济差距应该是最终目标,但解决戒烟、促进身体活动和治疗心血管疾病的公共卫生干预措施可能会在近期内为预防过早死亡带来好处。