From the University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, United Kingdom.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e387-e392. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000826.
Guidewire retention during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is considered a "never event." We analyzed the National Health Service England Never Event database (2004-2015) to explore the process of guidewire retention and identify potential preventative measures.
We performed a systematic analysis of reported retained guidewire incidents by 3 independent reviewers.
There was a rising frequency of reported retained CVC guidewires, with an average of 2 never events per month. Only 11% of retained guidewires are identified during the procedure itself, with the remainder identified during equipment clear-up (6%), after the procedure (4%), at the first check radiograph (23%), or after the first radiograph (55%). In 59 cases, the grade of the operator was reported, and among these, 88% were inserted by trainee doctors. Analysis of causative factors was only possible for 38 cases, and of these, operator's mistake (32%), operator/human error (16%), and distraction (16%) were the most common. Of 163 reported cases, preventative measures instigated were actions taken against the individual clinician (36%), departmental actions such as investigations, additional teaching or reminders (37%), and additional checklists (27%).
Most retained guidewires are discovered after the procedure. Despite the introduction of safety measures, guidewire retention still occurs because the checks, alerts, reminders, and additional checklists all solely rely on the operator remembering not to make the mistake. System changes or design modifications to the CVC equipment are needed to prevent guidewire retention, this being at the top of the hierarchy of intervention effectiveness.
导丝留置被认为是中心静脉导管(CVC)插入过程中的“绝不应该发生的事件”。我们分析了英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的永不事件数据库(2004-2015 年),以探讨导丝留置的过程并确定潜在的预防措施。
我们由 3 名独立评审员对报告的留置导丝事件进行了系统分析。
报告的留置 CVC 导丝的频率呈上升趋势,平均每月有 2 起永不事件。只有 11%的留置导丝是在手术过程中发现的,其余的是在设备清理(6%)、手术后(4%)、第一次放射检查时(23%)或第一次放射检查后(55%)发现的。在 59 例中报告了操作者的级别,其中 88%是由实习医生插入的。仅对 38 例进行了因果因素分析,其中操作者的失误(32%)、操作者/人为失误(16%)和注意力分散(16%)是最常见的原因。在报告的 163 例中,已采取的预防措施包括针对个别临床医生的行动(36%)、部门行动,如调查、额外教学或提醒(37%)和额外的检查表(27%)。
大多数留置导丝是在手术后发现的。尽管已经采取了安全措施,但导丝留置仍然发生,因为检查、警报、提醒和额外的检查表都仅依赖于操作者记住不要犯错误。需要对 CVC 设备进行系统更改或设计修改,以防止导丝留置,这是干预有效性的最高层次。