Spitzer Carleen R, Stinehart Kyle R, Jensen Will C, Start Amanda R
Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 May 15;16:795-800. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S513443. eCollection 2025.
Simulation is a well-established component of central venous catheter (CVC) training. However, there is little published regarding how to train residents to supervise CVC insertion.
We describe a curriculum designed to help trainees identify potential procedural errors and improve their comfort with supervising CVC insertion.
We conducted a one-group, pre-post-posttest study. All participants completed a pre-simulation assessment (Time 1) that evaluated residents' ability to identify potential complications with CVC insertion and their procedural completion and procedural supervision comfort. Residents then participated in a simulation in which they supervised a mock proceduralist insert a CVC and commit five pre-specified errors. Participants completed the same comfort assessment immediately following the simulation (Time 2) and repeat knowledge and comfort assessments five months later (Time 3).
Forty-seven interns participated in the study. Relative to Time 1 (M = 3.00, SD = 1.02), interns were significantly more comfortable supervising CVC insertion at Time 2 (M = 3.75, SD = 0.85) and at Time 3 (M = 4.08, SD = 0.58).
We describe a simulation designed to help residents identify errors when supervising CVC insertion. Due to a poor survey response rate, no comparisons between pre- and post-simulation error identification could be determined. However, following our CVC supervisor simulation, participants reported immediate and sustained increases in their comfort supervising CVC placement.
模拟是中心静脉导管(CVC)培训中一个成熟的组成部分。然而,关于如何培训住院医师监督CVC插入的文献报道很少。
我们描述了一个课程,旨在帮助学员识别潜在的操作错误,并提高他们监督CVC插入的舒适度。
我们进行了一项单组前后测研究。所有参与者完成了模拟前评估(时间1),评估住院医师识别CVC插入潜在并发症的能力以及他们的操作完成情况和操作监督舒适度。然后,住院医师参与了一次模拟,在模拟中他们监督一名模拟操作者插入CVC并犯下五个预先指定的错误。参与者在模拟结束后立即完成相同的舒适度评估(时间2),并在五个月后重复进行知识和舒适度评估(时间3)。
47名实习生参与了该研究。相对于时间1(M = 3.00,标准差 = 1.02),实习生在时间2(M = 3.75,标准差 = 0.85)和时间3(M = 4.08,标准差 = 0.58)时监督CVC插入的舒适度显著提高。
我们描述了一种模拟,旨在帮助住院医师在监督CVC插入时识别错误。由于调查回复率较低,无法确定模拟前后错误识别之间的比较。然而,在我们的CVC监督模拟之后,参与者报告说他们在监督CVC放置时的舒适度立即且持续提高。