• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠肾上腺再生性高血压模型

Models of adrenal regeneration hypertension in the rat.

作者信息

Foulkes R, Gardiner S M, Bennett T

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1988 Feb;6(2):117-22.

PMID:3351299
Abstract

Blood pressure was measured indirectly (using the tail-cuff method) and intra-arterially in conscious rats following one of three experimental procedures carried out in order to determine which resulted in the most marked and reproducible form of adrenal regeneration hypertension (ARH). All rats were unilaterally adrenalectomized and given NaCl solution (1%). In some rats, the remaining adrenal gland was either enucleated (AE rats) or compressed (AC rats) but both kidneys were left intact. During the fourth week after surgery, indirectly measured systolic blood pressure was higher in AE and AC rats than in sham-operated (SO) rats but, when measured intra-arterially, the magnitude of the developed hypertension was small (AC rats) or was absent altogether (AE rats). However, when a kidney was removed at the time of enucleation (AEN rats), the levels of systolic blood pressure, measured indirectly or intra-arterially, were markedly and consistently higher than in the corresponding group of uninephrectomized SO rats. The magnitude of the developed hypertension was similar in mature male and immature female AEN rats. We conclude that mature male rats, unilaterally nephro-adrenalectomized and given NaCl solution (1%), provide a marked and reproducible model of ARH.

摘要

为了确定哪种实验程序会导致最显著且可重复的肾上腺再生性高血压(ARH)形式,在清醒大鼠中采用了三种实验程序之一,之后通过间接测量(采用尾套法)和动脉内测量来测定血压。所有大鼠均进行单侧肾上腺切除术,并给予1%的氯化钠溶液。在一些大鼠中,对剩余的肾上腺进行摘除(AE大鼠)或压迫(AC大鼠),但双侧肾脏均保持完整。在术后第四周,间接测量的收缩压在AE和AC大鼠中高于假手术(SO)大鼠,但动脉内测量时,所产生的高血压程度较小(AC大鼠)或完全不存在(AE大鼠)。然而,当在摘除肾上腺时同时切除一个肾脏(AEN大鼠),间接或动脉内测量的收缩压水平均显著且持续高于相应的单侧肾切除SO大鼠组。成熟雄性和未成熟雌性AEN大鼠所产生的高血压程度相似。我们得出结论,单侧肾-肾上腺切除并给予1%氯化钠溶液的成熟雄性大鼠可提供一种显著且可重复的ARH模型。

相似文献

1
Models of adrenal regeneration hypertension in the rat.大鼠肾上腺再生性高血压模型
J Hypertens. 1988 Feb;6(2):117-22.
2
The influence of age on the activity of the renin-angiotensin system in rats with adrenal-regeneration hypertension.年龄对肾上腺再生性高血压大鼠肾素-血管紧张素系统活性的影响。
Physiol Bohemoslov. 1983;32(5):438-48.
3
The cardiovascular responses to sequential inhibition of alpha-adrenoceptors, the renin-angiotensin system and vasopressin in rats with adrenal regeneration hypertension.肾上腺再生性高血压大鼠中α-肾上腺素能受体、肾素-血管紧张素系统和血管加压素顺序抑制的心血管反应
J Hypertens. 1988 Apr;6(4):305-10.
4
[Studies on the renin-angiotensin system in adrenal regeneration hypertension (author's transl)].肾上腺再生性高血压中肾素-血管紧张素系统的研究(作者译)
Nihon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi. 1975 Apr 20;51(4):217-27. doi: 10.1507/endocrine1927.51.4_217.
5
Effects of adrenalectomy and nephrectomy on adrenal regeneration hypertension in the rat.肾上腺切除术和肾切除术对大鼠肾上腺再生性高血压的影响。
Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 1991 Oct;15(4):197-205.
6
Development of hypertension in a pyelonephritis-induced model: the effect of salt intake and inability of renal sodium handling.肾盂肾炎诱导模型中高血压的发展:盐摄入的影响及肾脏处理钠的能力不足
Ren Fail. 2006;28(6):501-7. doi: 10.1080/08860220600779058.
7
Hypertension from compression and/or enucleation of the adrenal glands in the rat.大鼠肾上腺受压和/或摘除所致的高血压
Tex Rep Biol Med. 1975;33(2):275-81.
8
Sodium balance after adrenal enucleation.肾上腺摘除术后的钠平衡。
Am J Physiol. 1980 Mar;238(3):E220-2. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1980.238.3.E220.
9
The development of renal hypertension in the rat.大鼠肾性高血压的发展
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1987 Mar;55(3):367-74.
10
A comparison of the development of renal hypertension in male and female rats.雄性和雌性大鼠肾性高血压发展情况的比较。
Clin Sci (Lond). 1998 Oct;95(4):445-51.