Rehabilitation Science Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
University of Florida Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab026.
Research supports the relevance of the therapeutic alliance (TA) between patients and physical therapists on outcomes, but the impact of TA during routine physical therapist practice has not been quantified. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between TA assessed during a physical therapy episode of care for patients with low back pain and functional outcome at the conclusion of care. The secondary objective was to examine psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) form, a patient-reported TA measure.
This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 676 patients (mean [SD] age = 55.6 [16.1] y; 55.9% female) receiving physical therapy for low back pain in 45 outpatient clinics from 1 health system in the United States. Participating clinics routinely collect patient-reported data at initial, interim, and final visits. The lumbar computer-adapted test (LCAT) was used to evaluate functional outcome. The TA was assessed from the patient's perspective at interim assessments using the WAI-SR, bivariate correlations were examined, and regression models were examined if interim WAI-SR scores explained outcome variance beyond a previously validated multivariate prediction model. Internal consistency and ceiling effects for the WAI-SR were examined.
Interim WAI-SR scores were not correlated with patient characteristics or initial LCAT, but they were correlated with final LCAT and LCAT change from initial to final assessment. WAI-SR total score (adjusted R2 = 0.36), and Task (adjusted R2 = 0.38) and Goal subscales (adjusted R2 = 0.35) explained additional variance in outcome beyond the base model (adjusted R2 = 0.33). Internal consistency was higher for WAI-SR total score (α = .88) than for subscales (α = .76-.82). Substantial ceiling effects were observed for all WAI-SR scores (27.2%-63.6%).
Findings support the importance of TA in physical therapist practice. Measurement challenges were identified, most notably ceiling effects.
This study supports the impact of the patient-physical therapist alliance on functional outcome. Results extend similar findings from controlled studies into a typical physical therapist practice setting. Better understanding of the role of contextual factors including the therapeutic alliance might be key to improving the magnitude of treatment effect for discrete physical therapist interventions and enhancing clinical outcomes of physical therapy episodes of care.
研究支持患者与物理治疗师之间治疗联盟(TA)与治疗结果之间的相关性,但 TA 在物理治疗师常规实践中的影响尚未量化。本研究的主要目的是检查在接受腰痛治疗的物理治疗过程中评估的 TA 与治疗结束时的功能结果之间的关系。次要目的是检查工作联盟量表-简短修订版(WAI-SR)形式的心理测量特性,这是一种患者报告的 TA 测量方法。
这是一项对来自美国 1 个医疗系统的 45 个门诊诊所的 676 名(平均[SD]年龄=55.6[16.1]岁;55.9%为女性)接受腰痛物理治疗的患者前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。参与的诊所通常会在初始、中期和最终就诊时收集患者报告的数据。使用腰椎计算机适应测试(LCAT)评估功能结果。在中期评估中,从患者的角度使用 WAI-SR 评估 TA,检查了双变量相关性,并在中期 WAI-SR 评分解释了超过先前验证的多变量预测模型的结果变异性时,检查了回归模型。还检查了 WAI-SR 的内部一致性和上限效应。
中期 WAI-SR 评分与患者特征或初始 LCAT 不相关,但与最终 LCAT 和从初始到最终评估的 LCAT 变化相关。WAI-SR 总分(调整后的 R2=0.36)、任务(调整后的 R2=0.38)和目标子量表(调整后的 R2=0.35)解释了超过基础模型(调整后的 R2=0.33)的结果变异性。WAI-SR 总分的内部一致性(α=0.88)高于子量表(α=0.76-0.82)。所有 WAI-SR 评分均存在显著的上限效应(27.2%-63.6%)。
研究结果支持 TA 在物理治疗师实践中的重要性。确定了测量方面的挑战,尤其是上限效应。
本研究支持患者-物理治疗师联盟对功能结果的影响。结果将类似的对照研究结果扩展到典型的物理治疗师实践环境中。更好地了解包括治疗联盟在内的情境因素的作用可能是提高离散物理治疗干预措施治疗效果和增强物理治疗治疗效果的关键。