现役军人队列感觉组织测试的常模值。

Normative values for the Sensory Organization Test in an active duty military cohort.

机构信息

University of Puget Sound School of Physical Therapy, 1500 N. Warner St. #1030, Tacoma, WA, 98416, USA.

Army-Baylor Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Joint Base San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2021 Mar;85:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.01.014

PMID:33513530

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized dynamic posturography is commonly used to assess balance in service members, but normative values for the military population have not been established.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the normative values for the Motor Control Test (MCT), Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and the enhanced SOT (eSOT) within the military population and at which point do they differ?

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. 237 active duty service members (78 % male) completed the MCT, SOT and the eSOT with the sway manipulated at a gain of 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, or 2.0. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the means of men and women for the SOT and MCT composite scores. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the means of age groups for the SOT composite score. An independent t-test was used to compare the SOT composite scores from our military population to the manufacturer's normative (civilian) data. The means and standard deviations for the eSOT scores were reported for each gain. Paired-samples t-tests were performed to compare the SOT composite score with the eSOT composite score for each level of gain.

RESULTS

There was no difference between SOT composite scores for men and women (Mann-Whitney U = 4363.50, p = 0.19) or among age groups (Kruskal-Wallis = 2.77, p = 0.25). The mean SOT composite scores were not different from the manufacturer's normative values (p = 0.155). SOT composite scores were significantly higher than eSOT composite scores for gains of 1.4 (t = 3.16, p = 0.003), 1.6 (t = 5.73, p < 0.001), 1.8 (t = 5.26, p < 0.001) and 2.0 (t = 5.89, p < 0.001). MCT composite scores were lower in the 18-26 year old than the 36-45 year old age group (p = 0.013).

SIGNIFICANCE

This study establishes normative values for the MCT, SOT and eSOT in active duty military service members. The results suggest that the manufacturer's normal values are appropriate for making judgments about the postural stability of service members.

摘要

背景

计算机动态姿势描记术常用于评估军人的平衡能力，但尚未为军人人群建立正常参考值。

研究问题

在军人人群中，运动控制测试（MCT）、感觉组织测试（SOT）和增强 SOT（eSOT）的正常参考值是多少，在什么情况下会有所不同？

方法

这是一项横断面研究。237 名现役军人（78%为男性）完成了 MCT、SOT 和 eSOT，在增益为 1.2、1.4、1.6、1.8 或 2.0 时进行了摆动操作。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较男性和女性的 SOT 和 MCT 综合得分的平均值。使用 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验比较 SOT 综合得分的年龄组平均值。使用独立 t 检验比较我们的军人人群的 SOT 综合得分与制造商的正常（平民）数据。报告了每个增益的 eSOT 得分的平均值和标准差。进行配对样本 t 检验比较每个增益水平的 SOT 综合得分和 eSOT 综合得分。

结果

男性和女性的 SOT 综合得分（Mann-Whitney U=4363.50，p=0.19）或年龄组之间没有差异（Kruskal-Wallis=2.77，p=0.25）。SOT 综合得分与制造商的正常参考值没有差异（p=0.155）。与 eSOT 综合得分相比，增益为 1.4（t=3.16，p=0.003）、1.6（t=5.73，p<0.001）、1.8（t=5.26，p<0.001）和 2.0（t=5.89，p<0.001）时，SOT 综合得分显著更高。18-26 岁年龄组的 MCT 综合得分低于 36-45 岁年龄组（p=0.013）。