Department of Immunology, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021 Apr;17(4):247-256. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00460-3. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
In the three decades since endocrine disruption was conceptualized at the Wingspread Conference, we have witnessed the growth of this multidisciplinary field and the accumulation of evidence showing the deleterious health effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. It is only within the past decade that, albeit slowly, some changes regarding regulatory measures have taken place. In this Perspective, we address some historical points regarding the advent of the endocrine disruption field and the conceptual changes that endocrine disruption brought about. We also provide our personal recollection of the events triggered by our serendipitous discovery of oestrogenic activity in plastic, a founder event in the field of endocrine disruption. This recollection ends with the CLARITY study as an example of a discordance between 'science for its own sake' and 'regulatory science' and leads us to offer a perspective that could be summarized by the motto attributed to Ludwig Boltzmann: "Nothing is more practical than a good theory".
自威格散特会议(Wingspread Conference)提出内分泌干扰的概念以来的三十年中,我们见证了这一多学科领域的发展,以及越来越多的证据表明内分泌干扰化学物质对健康具有有害影响。只是在过去十年中,尽管进展缓慢,但监管措施方面已经发生了一些变化。在本观点中,我们将讨论内分泌干扰领域出现的一些历史要点,以及内分泌干扰带来的概念变化。我们还提供了我们对塑料中雌激素活性这一偶然发现所引发的事件的个人回忆,这一发现是内分泌干扰领域的一个创始事件。这一回忆以 CLARITY 研究为例,说明了“为了科学本身而进行科学”与“监管科学”之间的不和谐,并促使我们提出一种观点,可以用路德维希·玻尔兹曼(Ludwig Boltzmann)的名言来概括:“没有比好的理论更实用的了”。