Schriefer T N, Mills K R, Murray N M, Hess C W
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, London, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jan;51(1):60-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.1.60.
A magnetic stimulator was used for direct transcutaneous stimulation of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve in 15 normal subjects and in patients with Bell's palsy, demyelinating neuropathy, traumatic facial palsy and pontine glioma. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) thus elicited in the orbicularis oris muscle of controls were of similar amplitude but longer latency (1.3 SD 0.15 ms) compared with CMAPs produced by conventional electrical stimulation at the stylomastoid foramen. No response to magnetic stimulation could be recorded from the affected side in 15 of 16 patients with Bell's palsy. Serial studies in two patients demonstrated that the facial nerve remained inexcitable by magnetic stimulation despite marked improvement in clinical function. In the patient with a pontine glioma, the CMAP elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation was of low amplitude but normal latency. In six of seven patients with demyelinating neuropathy, the response to intracranial magnetic stimulation was significantly delayed. Magnetic stimulation produced no response in either patient with traumatic facial palsy. Although the precise site of facial nerve stimulation is uncertain, evidence points to the labyrinthine segment of the facial canal as the most likely location.
对15名正常受试者以及患有贝尔面瘫、脱髓鞘性神经病、外伤性面瘫和脑桥胶质瘤的患者,使用磁刺激器经皮直接刺激面神经的颅内部分。与通过茎乳孔进行传统电刺激所产生的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)相比,由此在对照组口轮匝肌中引出的CMAP具有相似的波幅,但潜伏期更长(1.3±0.15毫秒)。16例贝尔面瘫患者中有15例患侧对磁刺激无反应。对两名患者的系列研究表明,尽管临床功能有显著改善,但面神经对磁刺激仍无反应。在患有脑桥胶质瘤的患者中,经颅磁刺激引出的CMAP波幅较低,但潜伏期正常。7例脱髓鞘性神经病患者中有6例对颅内磁刺激的反应明显延迟。两名外伤性面瘫患者对磁刺激均无反应。尽管面神经刺激的确切部位尚不确定,但有证据表明面神经管的迷路段是最可能的部位。