• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贲门失弛缓症终末期行贲门肌层切开术与食管切除术术后生活质量比较。

Quality of Life After Operation for End-Stage Achalasia: Pull-Down Heller-Dor Versus Esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan;113(1):271-278. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.048. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.048
PMID:33515542
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy for end-stage achalasia is debated, and data on long-term functional results of myotomy and esophagectomy are lacking. We compared quality of life and objective outcomes after pull-down Heller-Dor and esophagectomy.

METHODS

The study included 32 patients, aged 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 49-70 years), who underwent the Heller-Dor operation with verticalization of the distal esophagus in case of first instance treatment or failed surgery caused by insufficient myotomy, and 16 patients, aged 58 years (IQR, 49-67 years; P = .806), who underwent esophagectomy after failed surgery for other causes. Data were extracted from a database designed for prospective clinical research. Postoperative dysphagia, reflux symptoms, and endoscopic esophagitis were graded by semiquantitative scales. Quality of life was assessed with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 68 months (IQR, 40.43-94.48 months) after pull-down Heller-Dor and 61 months (IQR 43.72-181.43 months) after esophagectomy (P = .598). No statistically significant differences were observed for dysphagia (P = .948), reflux symptoms (P = .186), or esophagitis (P = .253). No statistically significant differences were observed in the domains physical functioning (P = .092), bodily pain (P = .075) or general health (P = .453). Significant differences were observed in favor of pull-down Heller-Dor for the domains role physical (100 vs 100, P = .043), role emotional (100 vs 0, P = .002), vitality (90 vs 55, P< .001), mental health (92 vs 68, P = .002), and social functioning (100 v s75, P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

The pull-down Heller-Dor achieved objective results similar to those of esophagectomy with a better quality of life. This technique may be the first choice for end-stage achalasia in patients with null or low risk for cancer or after recurrent dysphagia caused by insufficient myotomy.

摘要

背景

对于贲门失弛缓症的终末期治疗存在争议,且缺乏关于肌切开术和食管切除术长期功能结果的数据。我们比较了下拉式 Heller-Dor 手术和食管切除术的生活质量和客观结果。

方法

该研究纳入了 32 名患者,年龄 57 岁(四分位距 [IQR],49-70 岁),他们接受了 Heller-Dor 手术,如果初次治疗或因肌切开术不足而导致手术失败,则垂直化远端食管,如果因其他原因导致手术失败,则进行食管切除术。数据取自一个为前瞻性临床研究设计的数据库。术后吞咽困难、反流症状和内镜食管炎通过半定量量表进行分级。采用 36 项简短健康调查问卷评估生活质量。

结果

下拉式 Heller-Dor 术后中位随访时间为 68 个月(IQR,40.43-94.48 个月),食管切除术为 61 个月(IQR,43.72-181.43 个月)(P=.598)。吞咽困难(P=.948)、反流症状(P=.186)或食管炎(P=.253)无统计学差异。在身体功能(P=.092)、躯体疼痛(P=.075)或一般健康(P=.453)方面无统计学差异。下拉式 Heller-Dor 在生理职能(100 比 100,P=.043)、情感职能(100 比 0,P=.002)、活力(90 比 55,P<0.001)、心理健康(92 比 68,P=.002)和社会功能(100 比 75,P=.011)方面具有统计学优势。

结论

下拉式 Heller-Dor 取得了与食管切除术相似的客观结果,生活质量更好。在癌症风险为零或低或因肌切开术不足导致复发性吞咽困难的患者中,该技术可能是贲门失弛缓症终末期的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Quality of Life After Operation for End-Stage Achalasia: Pull-Down Heller-Dor Versus Esophagectomy.贲门失弛缓症终末期行贲门肌层切开术与食管切除术术后生活质量比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan;113(1):271-278. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.048. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: long-term symptomatic follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial.Heller 肌切开术与 Heller 肌切开术加 Dor 胃底折叠术治疗贲门失弛缓症:前瞻性随机对照试验的长期症状随访。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1668-1674. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5845-x. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
3
Circumferential Heller myotomy can relieve chest pain in patients with achalasia: a prospective clinical trial.贲门失弛缓症患者行贲门周围肌层切开术可缓解胸痛:一项前瞻性临床试验
Esophagus. 2020 Oct;17(4):468-476. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00738-5. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
4
Improving the surgery for sigmoid achalasia: long-term results of a technical detail.改良乙状结肠失弛缓症手术:一项技术细节的长期结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Dec;32(6):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
5
Redo laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication versus rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a single-institution experience.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗失败后的 redo 腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术和 Dor 胃底折叠术与挽救性经口内镜下肌切开术治疗食管失弛缓症:单中心经验。
Surg Today. 2022 Mar;52(3):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02376-5. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
6
Outcomes of Heller Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Lessons From a 48-Year Prospective Experience With 4 Different Techniques.Heller 肌切开术治疗食管失弛缓症的结果:48 年采用 4 种不同技术的前瞻性经验教训。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):e27-e34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005677. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
Efficacy of pneumodilation in achalasia after failed Heller myotomy.贲门失弛缓症患者行Heller肌切开术失败后气囊扩张术的疗效
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Nov;28(11):1741-1746. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12875. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
8
Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for achalasia: long-term results.腹腔镜Heller肌切开术联合Dor胃底折叠术与Nissen胃底折叠术治疗贲门失弛缓症的随机对照试验:长期结果
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1023-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a776.
9
Laparoscopic Dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial.腹腔镜 Dor 术与 Heller 肌切开术后 Toupet 胃底折叠术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):18-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1822-y. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
10
Intraoperative diagnosis and treatment of Achalasia using EndoFLIP during Heller Myotomy and Dor fundoplication.在贲门肌层切开术和Dor胃底折叠术期间使用EndoFLIP对贲门失弛缓症进行术中诊断和治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08517-8. Epub 2021 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pull-down Heller myotomy improves the clinical outcome of advanced sigmoid achalasia.下拉式赫勒肌切开术可改善晚期乙状结肠贲门失弛缓症的临床疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12176-4.
2
Efficacy of laparoscopic cardiectomy combined with side overlap anastomosis for the treatment of terminal achalasia.腹腔镜贲门切除术联合侧侧吻合术治疗终末期贲门失弛缓症的疗效
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74143-8.
3
Management of end - stage achalasia with laparoscopic Heller myotomy: A case report.腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术治疗终末期贲门失弛缓症:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Dec;125:110545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110545. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
4
ADVANCED MEGAESOPHAGUS TREATMENT: WHICH TECHNIQUE OFFERS THE BEST RESULTS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.食管巨大症的先进治疗:哪种技术的疗效最佳?系统评价。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Jul 1;37:e1809. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400016e1809. eCollection 2024.
5
A novel reconstruction strategy in esophagectomy for megaesophagus.一种用于巨食管食管切除术的新型重建策略。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Sep 20;22:307-311. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.09.014. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Surgical Options for End-Stage Achalasia.贲门失弛缓症终末期的手术选择。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s11894-023-00889-2. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
Evaluating the Non-conventional Achalasia Treatment Modalities.评估贲门失弛缓症的非常规治疗方式。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 24;9:941464. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.941464. eCollection 2022.
8
Intraoperative risk factors for major complications after oesophagectomy: the surgical Apgar score.食管癌切除术后主要并发症的术中危险因素:手术阿普加评分
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep 9;35(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac111.