Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Cagino, Li, and Acholonu, Jr).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Cagino, Li, and Acholonu, Jr).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jun;28(6):1171-1182.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1% to 6%. Although surgery is often indicated, there are no definitive management guidelines. We aimed to investigate the optimal approach to surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy on the basis of a meta-analysis of previous studies.
We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to July 17, 2020.
There were no restrictions on study type, language, or publication date. Comparative and noncomparative retrospective studies that reviewed operative techniques used in surgery of adnexal masses in pregnancy were included. Meta-analyses were performed to assess outcomes. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019129709).
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Comparative studies were identified for laparoscopy vs laparotomy and elective vs emergent surgery (11 and 4, respectively). Elective surgery is defined as a scheduled antepartum procedure. For laparoscopy vs laparotomy, the mean maternal ages and gestational ages at time of surgery were similar (27.8 years vs 27.7 years, p = .85; 16.2 weeks in laparoscopy vs 15.4 weeks in laparotomy, p = .59). Mass size was larger in those undergoing laparotomy (mean 8.8 cm vs 7.8 cm, p = .03). The most common pathologic condition was dermoid cyst (36%), and the risk of discovering a malignant tumor was 1%. Laparoscopy was not associated with a statistically increased risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) or preterm delivery (PTD) (odds ratio [OR] 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-3.52; p = .31 and OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.47-1.89; p = .88, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days after laparoscopy vs 5.3 days after laparotomy (p <.001). The decrease in estimated blood loss in laparoscopy was not statistically significant (94.0 mL in laparotomy vs 54.0 mL in laparoscopy, p = .06). Operative times were similar in laparoscopy and laparotomy (80.0 minutes vs 72.5 minutes, p = .09). Elective surgery was associated with a decreased risk of PTD (OR 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.48; p = .05). Noncomparative studies were identified for laparoscopy and laparotomy. Laparotomy had more SABs and PTDs than laparoscopy (pooled proportion = 0.02 vs 0.07 and pooled proportion = 0.02 vs 0.14, respectively).
Laparoscopy for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy is associated with shorter length of hospital stay and similar risk of SAB or PTD. Elective surgery is associated with a decreased risk of PTD.
妊娠附件肿块的发生率为 1%至 6%。尽管手术通常是指征,但没有明确的管理指南。我们旨在根据之前研究的荟萃分析,研究妊娠附件肿块手术治疗的最佳方法。
我们使用 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Clinicaltrials.gov 进行了系统评价,检索时间从开始到 2020 年 7 月 17 日。
对研究类型、语言或发表日期没有限制。纳入了回顾性比较和非比较研究,这些研究评估了妊娠附件肿块手术中使用的手术技术。进行了荟萃分析以评估结果。这项研究在国际前瞻性注册系统评价(CRD42019129709)中进行了注册。
比较研究分别为腹腔镜与剖腹手术以及择期与紧急手术(分别为 11 项和 4 项)。择期手术定义为产前计划程序。对于腹腔镜与剖腹手术,母亲的平均年龄和手术时的孕龄相似(腹腔镜为 27.8 岁,剖腹手术为 27.7 岁,p=0.85;腹腔镜为 16.2 周,剖腹手术为 15.4 周,p=0.59)。手术中肿块的大小在剖腹手术中更大(平均 8.8 厘米对 7.8 厘米,p=0.03)。最常见的病理状况是皮样囊肿(36%),发现恶性肿瘤的风险为 1%。腹腔镜手术与自然流产(SAB)或早产(PTD)的风险增加无关(优势比 [OR] 1.53;95%置信区间 [CI],0.67-3.52;p=0.31 和 OR 0.95;95%CI,0.47-1.89;p=0.88,分别)。腹腔镜手术后的平均住院时间为 2.5 天,而剖腹手术后为 5.3 天(p<0.001)。腹腔镜手术中估计出血量的减少无统计学意义(剖腹手术为 94.0 毫升,腹腔镜为 54.0 毫升,p=0.06)。腹腔镜和剖腹手术的手术时间相似(腹腔镜为 80.0 分钟,剖腹手术为 72.5 分钟,p=0.09)。择期手术与 PTD 风险降低相关(OR 0.13;95%CI,0.04-0.48;p=0.05)。腹腔镜和剖腹手术分别为非比较研究。剖腹手术的 SAB 和 PTD 多于腹腔镜(合并比例分别为 0.02 对 0.07 和合并比例分别为 0.02 对 0.14)。
腹腔镜治疗妊娠附件肿块与较短的住院时间和相似的 SAB 或 PTD 风险相关。择期手术与 PTD 风险降低相关。