• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于对听觉处理障碍儿童记录的听觉脑干反应进行分类的机器学习模型比较。

Comparison of machine learning models to classify Auditory Brainstem Responses recorded from children with Auditory Processing Disorder.

作者信息

Wimalarathna Hasitha, Ankmnal-Veeranna Sangamanatha, Allan Chris, Agrawal Sumit K, Allen Prudence, Samarabandu Jagath, Ladak Hanif M

机构信息

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Mar;200:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105942. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105942
PMID:33515845
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) offer a unique opportunity to assess the neural integrity of the peripheral auditory nervous system in individuals presenting with listening difficulties. ABRs are typically recorded and analyzed by an audiologist who manually measures the timing and quality of the waveforms. The interpretation of ABRs requires considerable experience and training, and inappropriate interpretation can lead to incorrect judgments about the integrity of the system. Machine learning (ML) techniques may be a suitable approach to automate ABR interpretation and reduce human error.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this paper was to identify a suitable ML technique to automate the analysis of ABR responses recorded as a part of the electrophysiological testing in the Auditory Processing Disorder clinical test battery.

METHODS

ABR responses recorded during routine clinical assessment from 136 children being evaluated for auditory processing difficulties were analyzed using several common ML algorithms: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Decision Trees (DT), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost), and Neural Networks (NN). A variety of signal feature extraction techniques were used to extract features from the ABR waveforms as inputs to the ML algorithms. Statistical significance testing and confusion matrices were used to identify the most robust model capable of accurately identifying neurological abnormalities present in ABRs.

RESULTS

Clinically significant features in the time-frequency representation of the signal were identified. The ML model trained using the Xgboost algorithm was identified as the most robust model with an accuracy of 92% compared to other models.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study demonstrate that it is possible to develop accurate ML models to automate the process of analyzing ABR waveforms recorded at suprathreshold levels. There is currently no ML-based application to screen children with listening difficulties. Therefore, it is expected that this work will be translated into an evaluation tool that can be used by audiologists in the clinic. Furthermore, this work may aid future researchers in exploring ML paradigms to improve clinical test batteries used by audiologists in achieving accurate diagnoses.

摘要

引言

听觉脑干反应(ABR)为评估有听力困难个体的外周听觉神经系统的神经完整性提供了一个独特的机会。ABR通常由听力学家进行记录和分析,他们手动测量波形的时间和质量。ABR的解读需要相当多的经验和训练,而不恰当的解读可能导致对系统完整性的错误判断。机器学习(ML)技术可能是一种合适的方法来实现ABR解读的自动化并减少人为误差。

目的

本文的主要目的是确定一种合适的ML技术,以实现对作为听觉处理障碍临床测试电池中电生理测试一部分所记录的ABR反应的自动化分析。

方法

使用几种常见的ML算法:支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)、梯度提升(GB)、极端梯度提升(Xgboost)和神经网络(NN),对在常规临床评估期间从136名因听觉处理困难而接受评估的儿童中记录的ABR反应进行分析。使用了各种信号特征提取技术从ABR波形中提取特征,作为ML算法的输入。使用统计显著性检验和混淆矩阵来确定能够准确识别ABR中存在的神经学异常的最稳健模型。

结果

确定了信号时频表示中的临床显著特征。与其他模型相比,使用Xgboost算法训练的ML模型被确定为最稳健的模型,准确率为92%。

结论

本研究的结果表明,有可能开发出准确的ML模型,以实现对超阈值水平记录的ABR波形分析过程的自动化。目前尚无基于ML的应用程序来筛查有听力困难的儿童。因此,预计这项工作将转化为一种可供听力学家在临床使用的评估工具。此外,这项工作可能有助于未来的研究人员探索ML范式,以改进听力学家用于实现准确诊断的临床测试电池。

相似文献

1
Comparison of machine learning models to classify Auditory Brainstem Responses recorded from children with Auditory Processing Disorder.用于对听觉处理障碍儿童记录的听觉脑干反应进行分类的机器学习模型比较。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Mar;200:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105942. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder.听觉处理障碍儿童的听觉脑干反应
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Nov/Dec;30(10):904-917. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18046. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Auditory brainstem response classification: a hybrid model using time and frequency features.听觉脑干反应分类:一种使用时间和频率特征的混合模型。
Artif Intell Med. 2007 May;40(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
4
Can speech-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response become a useful tool in clinical practice?言语诱发听觉脑干反应能否成为临床实践中的有用工具?
Codas. 2016 Jan-Feb;28(1):77-80. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162014231.
5
Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后皮质下听觉处理的脑干诱发电位指数。
Ear Hear. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):e200-e214. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000411.
6
Auditory processing disorders: relationship to cognitive processes and underlying auditory neural integrity.听觉处理障碍:与认知过程及潜在听觉神经完整性的关系
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Feb;78(2):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.048. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
7
A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.一种用于客观确定听脑干反应阈值的简单算法。
Hear Res. 2019 Sep 15;381:107782. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107782. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities.学习障碍儿童的听觉脑干反应、中潜伏期反应和晚期皮质诱发电位
J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Jul-Aug;13(7):367-82.
9
Assessment of cochlear electrophysiology in typically developing children and children with auditory processing disorder.对发育正常儿童和听觉处理障碍儿童的耳蜗电生理学评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;151:110962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110962. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Objective auditory brainstem response classification using machine learning.基于机器学习的客观听性脑干反应分类。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Apr;58(4):224-230. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1551633. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
An Open-Source Deep Learning-Based GUI Toolbox for Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Analyses (ABRA).一个基于深度学习的用于自动听觉脑干反应分析(ABRA)的开源图形用户界面工具箱。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 20:rs.3.rs-6735294. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6735294/v1.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.人工智能在听力学中的应用:现状与未来方向的范围综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 6;24(22):7126. doi: 10.3390/s24227126.
3
An Open-Source Deep Learning-Based GUI Toolbox for Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Analyses (ABRA).
一个基于深度学习的用于自动听觉脑干反应分析(ABRA)的开源图形用户界面工具箱。
bioRxiv. 2025 Apr 2:2024.06.20.599815. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.20.599815.
4
Synergistic integration of Multi-View Brain Networks and advanced machine learning techniques for auditory disorders diagnostics.多视图脑网络与先进机器学习技术的协同整合用于听觉障碍诊断
Brain Inform. 2024 Jan 14;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40708-023-00214-7.
5
Bats experience age-related hearing loss (presbycusis).蝙蝠会经历与年龄相关的听力损失(老年聋)。
Life Sci Alliance. 2023 Mar 30;6(6). doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201847. Print 2023 Jun.